Yeah, if government regulations loosened to allow easier access to riskier investments by inexperienced investors or predatory VCs, there would be a lot more stock-based renumeration. Who cares about paying tax on the income generated by the difference between strike & fair market value if the grant also comes with a cash bonus exactly equal to the tax burden (and its income tax)?
EU banks have massive IT organisations and budgets so can afford to pay through the nose for contractor day rates. That's the ticket for frontline grunt wealth, and also the source of a lot of the risk-adverse 'bankist' mindset in a lot of experienced tech workers.
> Yeah, if government regulations loosened to allow easier access to riskier investments by inexperienced investors or predatory VCs, there would be a lot more stock-based renumeration.
No, if government regulations were loosened even more there would be exactly one thing and that is even more people ripped off by unscrupulous or outright criminal bankers. There's a reason why such terms as "accredited investor" exist.
> EU banks have massive IT organisations and budgets so can afford to pay through the nose for contractor day rates.
The only reason their budgets are so massive is that they are historically locked in mainframes and code untouched since the 70s, and people who (still) do COBOL etc. can command these high rates. Fixing up the cruft would require investments so high that the day rates for contractors pale and many banks attempting to do IT overhauls have paid billions to inevitably fail.
Banking IT is one hell of a shitfest, which I wouldn't dare to touch with a ten feet pole alone from a technological POV - the fact that IT and their needs are generally laughed at over the industry only confirms my position. Fintechs are different, but have their own issues - funding, data protection, questionable ethical decisions, reactions to security issues...
SE does not profit from its community websites (eg the ones we all read) aside from a vague "getting traffic to its enterprise product" which is probably not worth what they spend on hosting.
I don’t see how it’s my problem that their business model isn’t profitable. The board & C-suite still draw a salary, and the company value is built on unpaid labour.
And now we are contributing for free to Y Combinator!
(True - there's not much direct revenue from this comment I'm typing here, but this is Hacker News, the place where the imorotantninfirmationnos and YC is in the center of it, don't you see how cool they are?)
look, I get that you're not used to being called out on being hopelessly wrong. rephrasing the statement to be an empty tautology so you can be right is a waste of both of our times and only serves to protect your ego
Jeff seems to have a lot of trouble empathising with users, especially when they want something that clashes with whatever he has discovered is the 'right' solution. See blocklists in discourse, why people join unions, &c.
I lost my mind at this sentence. If feels like a first-class data type because the result of parsing is one of the built-in data types (which can be round-tripped to a similar JSON string). And as soon as you care about serialisation of types it starts feeling incredibly clunky.
Yeah exactly. The equivalent would be to have a JSON parser in C++ which turns a JSON file/object into a C++ object that is accessed in similar ways to other typical C++ objects. So:
{"key": value"} becomes json->key = "value" rather than json["key"]. In this library I feel as if they've used operator overloading to emulate the way JSON is used in other languages, rather than making the JSON feel like a first class C++ citizen so to speak.
I think as far as other languages are concerned, the best JSON handling gives youn Serde in Rust and F#, from what I read. If only C++ metaprogramming was easier without crazy complexity, Json library would be made to be much smaller and more efficient with less work.
If you want to convert it to an object, have you tried using dataclasses? I haven't used them much, but last time I tried them they felt much easier than trying to use the native dict/list/str/int/etc. that gets returned by default.
yes, when I’m preparing my prestigious project with my Ivy League peers I make sure not to sanitize or vet my inputs so as not to bias the results of my programs or publication success. truly it is remarkable that the training set we chose to use is racist but no single person who could have stopped this or be held responsible is
If your data set was compiled by a single person, well, easy enough.
If your data set was compiled by thousands of mechanical turk workers, well, you got a lot of people to blame a little bit. As it goes, "everybody is a little racist sometimes..." and apparently that shows on a big enough data set.
This...
You can get so tired that cooking a meal from scratch is just not something you feel like doing. Having frozen meals or being able to throw some pasta or rice together with something prepared earlier is preplanning well spent.
And if someone asks if they can do anything to help - suggest cooking a meal.
Saw some midwifes, bought some baby stuff. Oh, and I let my work know so I could take some paternity leave. Probably a good idea to get a few nappies, the hospital gave out a couple of freebies but you’re going to want to use more.
The serious answer is, there’s nothing we can think of and say, oh I wish we’d done/had that. Be ready for a lot of disruption and learning on short notice and bonding with a new person who’ll depend on you for everything and is working really hard on improving their communication.
Oh you’ll probably also benefit from knowing where the hospital is, how to get there, where to park/get off the bus, &c.
EU banks have massive IT organisations and budgets so can afford to pay through the nose for contractor day rates. That's the ticket for frontline grunt wealth, and also the source of a lot of the risk-adverse 'bankist' mindset in a lot of experienced tech workers.