Do you have a guide for how to set this up? I am also pretty dissatisfied with Copilot completions.

Here you go: https://docs.continue.dev/autocomplete/model-setup

The sibling comment also describes the process for chat, which I personally don’t care about.

Probably via Tabby (https://www.tabbyml.com/)

Tabby is great! Though they broke the vim plugin going for lsp support, but older version still works fine.

looks like the parent comment hints at https://docs.continue.dev/chat/model-setup#local-offline-exp...

(Assuming your computer has the specs necessary to run ollama)

That page is about chat while the parent comment seems to be about completions, that's the codepilot feature most of us will be looking to replace/improve on.

Here's the similar docs page for completions: https://docs.continue.dev/autocomplete/model-setup#local-off...

Use Continue https://ollama.com/blog/continue-code-assistant

Also interested !

In general I completely agree that code name overload is dreadful. But I think in this case, where this pair is so fundamental and used so frequently in the codebase, I think I would probably permit it. Beware codename creep.

The .value thing is dreadful. Is it really necessary? I still prefer options API.

It really is awful and smells of leaky abstraction.

Now that this is the recommended way of writing Vue, I’d be really interested in your opinion on React.

Compare the “ref” in Vue with useState hook in React.

With the useState you get back two items: the value, and a setter.

Now every time you access the value you simply access it like a variable because it is.

That's just how Proxy works in JavaScript. You might want to read a bit more about the underlying mechanism.

I run and pub and brewery in the east of England that was established in 1991. We have lots of breweries around here and none of them seem to be on openbrewerydb. I have joined the Discord and will see if I can contribute some info.

I look forward to adding it to the dataset. Cheers, euoia!

As a Suffolk resident, can I ask which one?

Green Dragon in Bungay, pop in and say hello some time

Will do. I’m further South but up that way occasionally for raw milk!

Just guessing but perhaps with a phishing attack on a Microsoft domain.

This is genuinely something I hadn't considered. A test tenant may have been in a more than ideal position to stage phishing attacks from. Hopefully this is the case, and not a more concerning lack of disclosure or shudder NSL situation.

This seems similar to how Eloquent (Laravel's ORM) will, by default, make separate IN queries when you ask for a collection plus its relationships (instead of using a JOIN).

I have thought about how you might return normalised data to your front-end and, with support from a front-end library, rebuild the object relationships so you can access them naturally.

I looked into JSON:API and indeed there is a Laravel library for working with JSON:API https://github.com/laravel-json-api/laravel.

One place I got stuck with JSON:API is that support for updating a row and its relationships in a single API request seems to have been kicked around for a while and is unresolved: https://github.com/json-api/json-api/issues/795

There is an atomic operations extension: https://jsonapi.org/ext/atomic/

But is currently unsupported by laravel-json-api: https://github.com/laravel-json-api/laravel/issues/39

I use it as part of a till / ePOS system to run a small node / express http server that drives a receipt printer and cash drawer.

What sort of thing have you designed? I’m curious what the real world uses are for these sorts of tools.

It was a kind of laser scanning instrument, for my job. Measuring the intensity of reflected light. Don't want to get into it too much.

Stealthy answer

I’m curious how the appeared on your statement. Did a transaction of money coming into your account disappear?

There was no transaction. It looked like the money had never been there.

I don’t understand. Doesn’t your balance equal the sum of your transactions on your statement? I understand there is no outgoing transaction, but unless some “money in” lines were removed then how does it add up?

I don't know. The bank should explain that to me, but I haven't had anything from them.

Same. It would have been nice to know that I need approval before writing out my post.

Requiring approval for the first couple of posts from new users is one of the most sensible anti-spam policies. I'd much rather see more of that than the current forced AI training labor favored by most sites.

hey sorry about that - you should be approved now and i went ahead and added a message for un-approved users so they'll know before they make a post