I've worked for Mindgeek in the past (left 2 years ago) and still had friends working there. Many dozens of employees were locked out of their accounts this morning, none of them knowing what the hell was going on. A personal friend of mind had to wait until 2pm to get a call from HR finally telling him the news, even though it had been so long that the media were already aware of the fact.
I still remember when Feras was on stage at a town hall meeting 2ish years ago telling us that the company wasn't going to do any RRSP matches to the employees because we were "too young to think about retirement", all the while driving around his bright yellow Porsche Cayenne and getting his 19 million dollar mansion built.
Considering they were still reeling from Visa and MC cutting off their service and having to rely on cryptocurrency for payment, it's no surprise to me that now that crypto is failing hard, the value of those payments is vastly reduced and so is, probably, existing cash that was still in the crypto space.
I have to know—are videos/content in the dev environment... placeholders? Or are features and other dev work done with actual porn videos? I realize sometimes one might need get the latest from prod for whatever reason, but surely day-to-day dev work isn't done with videos that—distracting?
In the dev environment we had custom videos uploaded, and I often uploaded my own. Nice kittens and puppy videos and such. Still, the mindgeek office life was mostly the same as any office, except for the porn on half the screens.
As with anything else at one point you get desensitized by the same content, since it was all test data and not live production stuff, it didn't get updated often.
Yeah I know about that RRSP line too. RRSP matching was one of the hottest ask at the time but they just brushed it off quickly. The salary was also shitty comparing to others.
Does the 2 years ago lawsuit caused havoc to the Pornhub website? I heard 10 million videos got deleted, so I guess the website traffic must be dropped a ton, isn't it?
I'm not sure if anything changed in a day, but I'm not getting that result at all (in fact, I'm not getting a "did you mean Chrome" either). The latter isn't explainable by me, but for the former... well, remember the search results are tailored to you (that's another pandora's box about echo chambers in itself) so perhaps you've been searching for more security-oriented things and that affects your results. In my case, the first page was mostly official Firefox links, wikipedia, and the very last result of the first page was "Google Just Gave 2 Billion Chrome Users A Reason To Switch To Firefox" so it doesn't seem like there's anything awry going on here.
I'll need to echo some of the other comments here - at work we're pretty much stuck with Skype for Business (aka "lync") because the voice system ties into it. When I suggested Discord, it was shrugged off because it's "Chat for Gamers" and clearly they're not going to budge from that niche anytime soon, from all the recent features I've seen.
That's nice misinformation, mate. Discord makes money from Nitro, and they started off with a fairly large investor cushion which grew since launch.
There is nothing in the ToS that states in any way, shape, or form, that they can sell their data. I challenge you to quote the exact place where it says that.
Yup this, our privacy policy plainly states that we're not in the business of making money from your data. We have various provisions which limit how and when we can share your data.
If a company drafts ToS and then plumb violates them, well, it'll be found out eventually and then you get things like the recent debacle with telco data being sold (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15477286), and then the company(s) in question will either get completely shredded or their reputation will at least be seriously besmirched.
I can see the logic of what you're saying, but at the same time I can't see how it would hold up. If you can show me how it would work I'm listening though.
As soon as you start your own business, you'll know all of this. The short gist of it is when you incorporate, you have to publish rules that govern your entire operation. These are either your articles of incorporation or your bylaws, depending upon the type of entity you are.
If "Don't sell customer data, even surreptitiously" isn't in those bylaws or articles, then the company is free and clear to do that. ToS says how you can use THEIR service externally, not how they internally operate.
Ironically, one of the reasons I'm extremely happy with my current bank is that it lets me save my password through Chrome on its online banking. Yes, I know that's no super secure (I'm not sure how Chrome's password manager is in regards to security), but it's just... so convenient!
The way I see it, it's essentially because of frameworks and engines. For example in games, I've seen simple isometric games with very little graphic intensity build with huge game engines like Unity or Unreal. 20 years ago, that same game would have been built almost directly with machine code and be just as beautiful (adjusting for screen resolution and quality from back then). Well, that's my theory based largely on assumptions.
Software and Web is probably the same - I remember building very small websites from scratch, painstakingly writing each line of HTML and CSS myself to be as optimized as possible. Today, I'd probably have to start with a framework like Foundation or Bootstrap. Or maybe Semantic-UI which would require node.js to be installed and gulp and whatever. That stack can help with fast development, but it's probably not as optimized as doing everything in notepad++, right?
The company I work for just re-built our whole flagship product from scratch. It was previously in Delphi 6, and now it's in Java. Notwithstanding the prejudice against Java and speed, the reality is that the software now requires like 16MB of RAM and still takes more than a minute to load. And then it's slow as hell, both for use and for actually producing its output (it's print management and VDP).
About the last point about generating content, I think it's extremely likely that this leads us down the path of Voxels and Procedural Generation. Both those techniques together would help us at least get a starting point for an environment that's generated from certain chosen parameters, and then the "least effort" becomes modifying that environment for your game needs.
I mean, if you can have a procedurally generated jungle with a huge mountain in the middle and a river cutting through the jungle, all you need to do really is to cut through the mountain for your secret underground base, create a couple of roads, camps and checkpoints and you've got a better remake of FarCry 1 (yeah I'm extrapolating of course but you get the idea).
Personally I'm more than a little annoyed at their journal-type "quotes", especially because they put the quote directly under the paragraph they just quoted, so you're basically just reading the exact same sentence twice, one after the other. And they do this 9 times. It's just... horrible.
I still remember when Feras was on stage at a town hall meeting 2ish years ago telling us that the company wasn't going to do any RRSP matches to the employees because we were "too young to think about retirement", all the while driving around his bright yellow Porsche Cayenne and getting his 19 million dollar mansion built.
Considering they were still reeling from Visa and MC cutting off their service and having to rely on cryptocurrency for payment, it's no surprise to me that now that crypto is failing hard, the value of those payments is vastly reduced and so is, probably, existing cash that was still in the crypto space.