Yep, we are planning to capture Moscow, disband RF, then take Kuban and Königsberg as compensation.

It looks like copy of https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/01/07/kevin-mcca...

It’s copy of a Russia Today story.

The details of the Telegraph article are different from the headline.

> According to reports, to end the impasse, Mr McCarthy agreed a deal that the House would commit to passing bills that would cap all discretionary defence spending at 2022 financial year levels, meaning roughly $1.47 trillion. Congress has passed four emergency supplementals totalling more than $100 billion since Russia’s invasion in February.

> President Joe Biden will require Congress to approve any additional military aid later this year. Should one of the rebel lawmakers - who have vowed to oppose any further aid packages - be given leadership roles in the House Rules Committee it could create immense hurdles to passing additional assistance legislation.

Capping defense spending, and creating a veto-ocracy are very different than “cutting aid to Ukraine.”

The Telegraph article headline includes a quote: “agreed to cut aid to Ukraine”, but nowhere in the article is that quote found.

Anyone writes anything about war with RF in Ukraine?

Well you can have your own interpretation of copyright law, but the Supreme Court – who ruled in favor of Google exactly on the basis of these three tests I shared above – will disagree with you.

As opposed to all of the other non-tyrants companies, including profit-seeking and non-profit companies.

Which companies are those that aren’t “tyrants”?

I would suggest to read the text and then contribute to the discussion. We have access to search engines too.

> If I give you a ... Hollywood movie, ... that isn't not copyright infringement.

It is.

I'm no lawyer, but judging how people reacted to DeCSS (09F9 1102 9D74 E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0, anyone?)… why do you say this isn't copyright infringement?

CopyLoot model of business ruins Open Source model of business (AKA Open Core) and Open Source movement in general.

So what? I can inspect downloaded code and find the backdoor, or a trojan, or an error. I did it few times already in last 30 years. If you cannot do that doesn't mean that nobody can. But I cannot do that with `curl | bash`.

If you can't save the output of curl into a file, you certainly aren't one of the few people capable of meaningfully inspecting anything you download.

I cam do that on MY machine. I cannot do that on your. I can download code, inspect it, install, and then create a RPM package, which can be installed in a safe way by DNF package manager, but I cannot do that with `curl | bash` method of installation.

>I can download code, inspect it, install, and then create a RPM package, which can be installed in a safe way by DNF package manager, but I cannot do that with `curl | bash` method of installation.

But you can?

> If Ubuntu had spent resources to develop a convenient way for developers to directly provide binaries to the users of their OS

No way. I will never trust your binary.

Lol, like you audit the thousands of lines of code when you compile from source.

What made you think they'd be willing to compile from untrusted sources?

There are a lot of users that prefer the established trust model of a Linux distribution. They're willing to trust the mostly unpaid debian maintainers for example... but not John Doe, the temporarily set back billionaire who's just about to make it big

Yes, I look at code. I'm professional developer. I will spend 1-2 minutes at scanning per thousand of lines.

I’m a developer too. Currently job title “senior enterprise systems engineer”. It would take me much longer than that to ensure the code is ok. Additionally without modelling the code (and proving it correct) in something like COQ, you will never understand the calculus of inductive constructions behind the code and have no guarantees as to its correctness.