Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dhhdhdsbdb's comments login

There is a documented history of this kind of thing. See https://www.vox.com/2015/1/15/7551873/jaywalking-history


That is a vox article. It's fun to read and gets a lot of shares on social media. But it wildly exaggerates reality and wildly downplays that massive demand and growth in car ownership during that period.

The idea that everyone hated cars and the evil car lobby came in and forced it upon them is flat out incorrect.


> The idea that everyone hated cars and the evil car lobby came in and forced it upon them is flat out incorrect.

This idea is not present in the article and is a wild exaggeration of your own.


I don't see the article claiming people hated cars.

What the auto industry accomplished was to push the government to favor cars to the eventual exclusion of almost every other form of transit.

Even if people didn't hate cars, this still wasn't a fair fight in an open market. It was an industry co-opting consumer and voter power.


You'll probably convince more people by citing evidence to support your claims instead of using ad homs.


Literally and chart about automobile ownership from 1940 to 1980.


Such a chart would in no manner prove your point. Something can become prevalent could be because (a) it is the preferred option out of many equivalent and equally available options or (b) it is the chosen option due to having been given preferentially treatment. Given that your time period contains Eisenhower's expansion of the federal highway system, option (b) is the more reasonable interpretation.


We've seen the phenomenon globally.


Not in the way it is in the US...

Even Paris discussed in TFA is 10 times better than 99% of American cities... and most of European cities are even better walkability wise...


Totally agreed, and I'm not even much of an investor.


In the US, regulating sex was a priority that predates the government by a couple hundred years.


If you mean the geographical region corresponding to what is today the US, we can be confident that regulating sex was a priority for the last many thousands of years.

If you mean the cultural entity from which the US descends, we can be absolutely certain that regulating sex was a priority for the last many thousands of years. (We are generally happy to trace US regulations back to pre-colonial England; I don't see why we wouldn't do the same here.)


Can you segment by Geo? It may be that users with slower connections or phones use Google more


We can’t do geo segments (yet) on Crux.run but we could test against bigquery directly


I think this is a great way to spread info. You're there, probably doing nothing. And everyone has to pee!


Otoh, governments can detain, arrest, or kill you and your family. Regardless of whether you can vote.

Both corporations and governments have a history of bad behavior. But I warrant the government ledger has much worse capacity to do me harm, as well as a few orders of magnitude more deaths caused by their decisions.


Im sorry, but I really don't understand your perspective. Does Porsche screw their customers when they charge $500 for an oil change? Is Coach "screwing" it's customer by charging that much for a purse? High five audio devices often don't have cabling that consumer devices do - is that screwing the consumer?

I can appreciate that you don't want to pay that much, but how is it "screwing"?


"Does Porsche screw their customers when they charge $500 for an oil change"

Uh, yes? Either they've designed their cars so that routine maintenance is unnecessarily difficult or they're overcharging for it, either way they're screwing you.

As an enthusiast it's been my experience that high end audio stuff is usually designed in a modular way and uses standard inputs and outputs and it's the cheaper, consumer grade gear that often uses stuff like non standard speaker inputs. Although the HiFi market certainly has it's own fair share of overpriced snake oil.

I don't know much about coach specifically so I won't comment on that, but there are plenty of handbag brands that exist purely as a status symbol and charge obscene amounts of money just because customers are willing to pay that much, and yes I also perceive that as dishonest.


>but how is it "screwing"?

Because all you get for $1000 is a one nice stand?


Good thing the Apple Watch is such a good bargain then, since all you get from Rolex for $10000 is one nice watch.

Not all things in technology are created for all people. If you think selling a $6000 screen with a $900 discount if you only need a VESA mount because you already have a $2000 desk & mount setup is absurd, you’re not the target market.


Good thing the Apple Watch is such a good bargain then, since all you get from Rolex for $10000 is one nice watch.

A Rolex is a piece of jewelry, a status symbol. Might as well compare it with a Louis Vuitton handbag. What you are saying is that the display is desktop jewelry.


The amazing book 1491 calls this Holmbergs mistake: that the indigenous people lined in a static world and didn't have the agency to make their own mistakes.


Are you recommending we don't work this avenue out of a sense of fairness?


Is this true? I always thought the decline was more often caused by removing habitats. Would be curious to know how this is measured and communicated.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: