Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | deleteme12345's comments login

Out of necessity or nah?


Lean management may be the answer


> “I don't agree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”


Wtf..

Slippery slope fallacy.


No, that's how we got here. We're already below that point on the slope. Fascist trash bins leak, into the real world.


> Hell, they have enough money to kick-off their own military industrial complex.

Wishful thinking.


>Wishful thinking.

Maybe! Hard to know if that's the extent of your comment. Care to explain why you think so?


A complete fuck up by objective standards? That's the most subjective thing I've heard so far. Everyone that has worked with him has praised him. What are you smoking?


The ABA downgraded him in 2005 from "well qualified" to "qualified", then in 2018 said that his confirmation to the Supreme Court was not in the best interests of the legal profession or the Association. Those are certainly the people who worked most closely with him.

Objectively, you'd want to find one of the top handful of legal scholars in America to serve on the court. Kavanaugh is not one of those people. He has a scant record of legal scholarship. He does have a documented record of getting into fights in bars.


You may not like him, but you are confusing opinion with facts.

Here are some facts:

At least 13 of his opinions have been vindicated by the Supreme Court already.

The American Bar Association unanimously gave him its highest rating: well-qualified.

He has served on the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, often called the Nation’s “second highest court,” for more than 12 years.

He has written more than 300 opinions and heard more than 2,000 cases.

He has taught for more than a decade at the Nation’s two top law schools, Yale and Harvard

He served more than five years in the White House, including as White House Staff Secretary and as Associate White House Counsel.

There are many many more.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/judge-brett-...


Or done charging.


Get a cat/dog guard.


Cheap Chinese pellet gun is cheaper. I'm sure chipmunk will work nearly interchangeably with squirrel in most recipes and arguably would be a little less white trash.


The degree of complexity and amount of unknown variables (eg. Backdoored CPUs, 0-day exploits) make digital mass voting a not-so-good option.

Paper, on the other hand, is fairly easy to comprehend and secure by all participants.


I agree. The main advantage of electronic voting (if properly secured) is speed and logistics.


Where? Lots of rent w/ furnished appliances in Montreal.


Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: