Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | curling_grad's commentslogin

They are running on Google's Nest Hub devices[0], so I guess this counts as a release?

[0] https://www.theverge.com/2021/8/18/22630245/google-fuchsia-o...


I'd assume that the value intended for public exponent is used as private key exponent. Typically, public key exponent is very small compared to private key exponent. This means that the private key exponent is very small in their scheme, so attacks such as Wiener's attack[0] can be used to break the encryption.

Also, I'd like to add that public exponent is usually fixed to some well-known constant such as 65537, so the attacker might just try brute-forcing when she knows the details of the scheme.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiener%27s_attack


Standard ciphers such as AES and SHA comes into my mind. Some processors even have dedicated hardware instructions speed up computations for such ciphers.


LLVM's Kaleidoscope tutorial[0] is a nice starting point.

[0]: https://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/


> Metal on Windows would not help much because the GPU hardware is what's different.

Apple shipped Intel Macs with Intel/AMD GPUs until quite recently, so hardware might not matter significantly.


Actually, OpenAI did a research[0] on solving some hard math problems by integrating language model and Lean theorem prover some time ago.

[0]: https://openai.com/research/formal-math


how do they achieve 41.2% in high school Olympiads but only 55% for grade school problems?

PS: also I thought GPT4 already achieved 90% in some university math grades? Oh I remember that was multiple-choice


> I am not sure that the runtime efficiency of the compiler binary is that important.

If the compiler is for JIT, then efficiency will be important.


I think WASM will be the mainstream for frontend before that happens... But you never can't predict the future!


If I remember correctly, the chips in D-Wave machines are for specific problems (optimization problems mostly), so it seems very unlikely they can run the quantum circuits proposed in the article.


Kind of irony that there is no Korean language option...


I'd assume that they don't feel any see a need to market Galaxy devices to Korean speakers.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: