Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | contact9879's commentslogin

installing third-party OSes on pixels does not void its warranty. It's one of the biggest reasons why GrapheneOS only supports Pixels and not e.g. Samsung's Galaxy lines.


They note in-post that it took ~2 months


Signal isn't in a Windows app store to be kicked out of, though


it is absolutely insane that we're forced to DRM our own applications to protect ourselves from our own computers


Agreed. Reading this makes my head explode a little.

15 years ago, DRM was all about the DVD restricting where and when it could be played. Now it seems like we're using DRM to reassert our own rights?

This timeline is cursed.


I think there was always a similarity or homology between DRM and many privacy scenarios that people care about:

Party A sends information to party B intended for use in a specific context, but wants to limit the risk of it being stored or forwarded for use by other parties or in other contexts.

DRM typically connotes that party A is a media company and the information is a movie or something, but - as in the case the article is about - party A could also just be a regular person and the information could be private personal info.


It's not even real DRM in any meaningful sense. It's just asking the OS really nicely to not allow the window to be screenshotted.


No, you can just turn Recall off. You don't need DRM for that.


Yeah, I'm a bit confused at all the Recall outrage. It's an opt-in app that only stores data locally. If you think they're lying and are going to secretly upload the screenshots, well they can do that already.


Enabled by default ≠ opt-in.


> To use Recall you need to opt in to saving snapshots, which are screenshots of your activity

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/retrace-your-ste...


> we're forced to DRM our own applications to protect ourselves from our own computers

it's an interesting irony, but it has an apt comparison to GPL - forcing the laws of copyright to enforce freedom.

It's a classic "hack" of the system!


Go back 10 years and tell people that MS periodically takes screenshots of your apps and sends them to MS and there would be heavy lawsuits.

AI has made people idiots in more ways than expected.


They're "Sending them to MS"? Huh?


Well, it's not so much our own computers we need to worry about, it's more computers we think of as ours, but we actually borrow from our school/work.

Windows Recall would be a pretty good feature if it somehow only worked for real personal computers.


It is absolutely insane that FUD and misinformation is the default now.


This is a revision of a paper that first appeared as an eprint back in September when PQ3 was announced.

https://eprint.iacr.org/2024/1395


I've been using a tangential but still pdf tool, pdfux.com since it was posted here on hn

Thanks for this! I'll definitely add it to my bookmarks


Quick example would be https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/mark-twain/the-innocents-a...

Try zooming in and out with text-wrap: pretty vs text-wrap: wrap


I... uh, wouldn't consider a text dump of a full novel getting completely typeset as a good example to consider when talking about sites?


sure, but html isn't only used in a browser context. I have a severely under-powered ereader that I use to read epubs (html). It already takes ten seconds to paginate on first open and font size changes. I can't imagine how long it would take to non-naively wrap lines


I don't know why you'd expect an ereader to do a full text optimization of a book, though? Pick the starting line and layout to the next screen's breaking point. If needed, consider if you left an orphan for the next page and try to adjust that into the current screen.

Are there ereaders that have to typeset the entire text of what you are reading? What is the advantage of making the task harder?


KOReader typesets the whole book at once. It is needed in order to get page counts right, for example.


Even if that is the case, it has to redo this how often? If the page counts are to be stable, I'm assuming so are page numbers? At which point we are back to this not being something I would expect to slow things down appreciably on the vast majority of actual uses.

Still, I should acknowledge you provided an example. It surprises me.


It needs to rerender everything whenever you change any setting that affects typesetting. This used to be quite annoying when trying out fonts or find the best value for some setting, but recently they implemented a better way so that it first renders the current fragment (usually a chapter), releases the UI so that you can read, and renders the rest in the background. Page counts and some other stuff are broken in this meantime.


That better way makes a ton of sense, and is what I would expect to be default. Getting page numbers is a flex that just doesn't feel necessary. As I said, I would expect even faster renders if it did present content first. Would edge case into unstable page counts, but I struggle to care on that? Make it an optional setting, and be done with it. Especially as I prefer resizing to keep the current start of page I'm looking at. Something obviously not guaranteed in a resize.


> it has to redo this how often?

As often as the font size changes.


So, never for most reads? :)

Even the few times I do change text size on my e-readers are largely mistakes. Having gestures to resize is frustrating, in the extreme.


Eh, I don't really have a dog in the fight. When I'm out and about I just read on my phone, which my oral surgeon says is too small for my eyes; I haven't asked my ophthalmologist for advice on my dental implants, but I have been reading as much off screens as off paper since the late 1980s, so any kind of sense I might once have had for the aesthetics of typography must surely have been strangled in the crib.

When I'm home, I read books.


the distributed proofreaders process does include a mandatory spellcheck


The work done by Distributed Proofreaders is pretty amazing. I try to contribute my 35 pages as often as I can. The backlog there is pretty insane even while finishing upwards of 150 ebooks per month

it truly is an "online hobby that feels constructive". you get these tiny glimpses into our shared literary/cultural history while knowing that the work you're doing is for the benefit of all (benefit of the public domain)


> The backlog there is pretty insane even while finishing upwards of 150 ebooks per month

Isn't the backlog there mostly in the post-processing step, though? To the point where they're taking finished texts and running them again through the page-by-page proofreading in hope of fishing out more OCR typos and improving the format markup?

You can also contribute at Wikisource if you prefer, that doesn't really have a post-processing step and has much less of a fixed pipeline. (There are explicit "proofreading" and "verification" steps per page, but not much beyond that.)


Standard Ebooks grew out of a pay-what-you-want experiment that Alex did ~10 years ago


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: