Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | clcaev's commentslogin

Someone who stops at road side, and helps a stranger with a tire iron, likely has no reason other than it just feels the right thing to do; the recipient's smile being the most precious payment they could possibly receive.

Pharma ads as AI health advice will be super profitable. AIs are very engaging and able convince people they have a disease, inadvertently coach them on how to mislead their doctor, and how to fast track diagnosis supporting their specific meds. The only guard is to have detailed manifest of exactly what was used in training. Even that may prove insufficient as "final assembly" has emergent properties. For example, omitting case reports of severe outcomes for a given formulation. Bias can be constructed.


I spent many fun hours there! It blew my mind to discover a game world that was so deeply player-driven and offered so many possibilities - my main character became a professional author...

I earned my first money in-world by writing poetry. At first I hand-wrote it and sold it on the street to other players (probably because they had compassion on a poor first-level wizard who didn't know anything about the game). Later on I had a book of my poems printed and sold in the local bookshops, and went on to write for one of the player-run newspapers. Good fun :-)


I loved the collaborative stories that unfolded on the boards. There were literature majors, authors, and all sorts of creative people who contributed. We also experimented with DSLs so those people could help build the world.

I inadvertently trigger the camera all the time, perhaps due to sweaty hands. Thank you.


Farmers do not own the water that flows through their property. This is a Riparian rights concern and is quite complicated.


Its definitely complicated. But the end of the story is that the government can not easily stop the farmers from using water in many of these drought stricken areas. Its going to be a big political battle


Yet the average household seems weaker now than 16 years ago. Perhaps policy guided by this metric could use rethinking.


Your observation is about distributional characteristics of the economy which, in terms of policy, are addressed by fiscal policy and not monetary policy; the former remains in the hands of Congress and the President without delegation to the Federal Reserve, which has been given only a narrow set of tools adapted to and a mission related to broad aggregate performance.


The median household income is higher today in real terms than it was in 2008.


> Sadly we do not have, and will never have, the resources to help everyone, even to a baseline of human dignity.

This is really a matter of choice. There is a level of treatment that most people could have with far less friction. We just have decided to organize our economy otherwise.

Broadly, we need to stop seeing our economy as a zero sum game. It's dehumanizing. So what if there are a few bad actors that abuse the situation? Most don't. If everyone is doing something harmful, eg smoking, then we need strong public education, etc.


> Stallman was right.

Stallman did not find an economic model that works within our business/legal environment.


Non sequitor. He was right about what companies would do if allowed, and that's the most important thing to keep in mind.


There wasn't much foresight required on his part because companies were already doing things like this way back when. As a trivial example, patents on DRM predate the oft-cited "Right To Read" by a decade or more. Stallman just observed these trends and took an opposing stance without (to GP's point) really addressing the economic incentives and nuances involved.

Maybe his biggest contribution is that his extreme stance and ensuing visibility probably helped shift the Overton window.


Current big tech is based on Stallman-inspired people using their free time to make software. But they are putting MIT lisence because ”someone” had convinced them that GPL is not really free and not socially acceptable!


What is the business model / exit strategy for Kagi's founders and investors? What is the news curation process and its relation to the public interest?

Are these articulated in a manner which gives stakeholders (investors, users, and staff) assurances and standing?

...

What are competitors and collaborators in this space? Semafor seems to have a similar product, what are the differentiators and/or collaboration opportunities?

...

Netflix was subscription only, till it was "pay to get rid of ads". Then there is the whole business of profiling customer interest, etc.

We have product labeling for food, why not web services?


Read the "About" section of the page.


And just like Netflix, if kagi turns into paid Google I'll cancel my subscription.

IDK what their future plans are, but there current plans work well for me as a consumer.


As more legislators (and supreme court judges) use their donors' private airplanes, how much will they think about the typical flight experience?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: