Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ck2's commentslogin

but why wouldn't enterprise just run W10 LTSC until 2038 ?

there will probably be ATMs running LTSC even past 2038


Where are you seeing support until 2038? I see support until 2027.

Even if it was 2038, Win10 LTSC only supports hardware from the time it was originally released. That might or might not be a problem today, but it definitely will be problematic long before 2038.


sorry my brain mis-remembered 2032 wrong

W11 LTSC is 2034

even the commercial ESU for Windows 10 general release will go to October 2028


The most aggressive yet most realistic project we could reasonably do is the SGL Telescope

Won't happen under this administration and really might take a planet-wide effort but it would be incredible

https://www.centauri-dreams.org/2022/07/22/solar-gravitation...

https://www.nasa.gov/general/direct-multipixel-imaging-and-s...

https://www.universetoday.com/articles/a-mission-to-reach-th...


We're approaching the point where someone will put together every form of energy harvest, solar, kinetic, temperature, air pressure (from wind, etc) and just store it in a super-capacitor for whatever you are wearing/holding, watch, phone etc.

Garmin already has solar on many watches to extend battery and the Kinefox is already doing kinetic on animal tracking

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure/image?downl...


Solar and body heat are overwhelmingly the most potent out of all of those. And even then the only reason I'm listing body heat is because of how often things will be in pockets or bags and therefore not exposed to sunlight — small heat differences are fundamentally inefficient to extract useful work from.

For motion: The "standard" calorific demands of a human work out as about 100-120 watts or so; adding some mechanism that extracts energy from your motion, makes your motion harder by that plus whatever gets lost as heat (which can't be extracted efficiently). Something that makes you burn an extra 500 kcal/day would at best be 24 watts, but whatever it was it would basically have to put continuous resistance on some of your movement to get that, like an exoskeleton but it doesn't assist you it just slows you down the whole time.

Now, someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I think human biological efficiency is around 25%? So that 500 kcal/day -> 24 watts actually looks like (6 watts of mechanical output + 18 watts of heat)?

And those 18… the theoretical maximum efficiency depends on the difference between the hot side and the cold side, so to be as efficient as possible you'd need to be somewhere cold. The Carnot efficiency limit is η = 1 - T_cold/T_hot (absolute temperature, i.e. in Kelvin), so human body temperature of 310 K (37°C), somewhere really cold 253 K (-20°C) -> 1 - 253/310 = 0.184 (18%), which gets you 3.3 W from an extremely unpleasant experience.

Even the full 24 W is about what you'd get from a T-shirt made from the best solar cells with a reasonable assumption about capacity factor.

The only places I'm aware of where wind beats muscle, is inside a hurricane or a tornado. And that's if you could harvest it on a size scale comparable to your body.

> Garmin already has solar on many watches to extend battery and the Kinefox is already doing kinetic on animal tracking

Some of the mechanical watches when I was a kid were advertised as keeping themselves wound from body motion. Apparently those predate my birth by over two centuries.

My school calculator back in 1995 was already solar powered, too.

Neither of these uses are power-hungry.


Makes sense...basically the energy equivalent of Herbert's https://dune.fandom.com/wiki/Stillsuit


light doesn't move at a fixed rate

light moves AT the speed of causality in that frame of time

causality appears to have a MAXIMUM limit in this universe in an "empty" void

but every time you hear a story of how they "slowed down light" what they actually did is make causality more complex in a dense medium, so slower


less useful but vaguely related

https://1.1.1.1/help

and even less usefull

https://ipv6test.google.com


https://cloudflare.com/cdn-cgi/trace also tells you your IP address (but not both), and is notable because it works on any site that cloudflare attacks

Government should make them put lead on the RDA label as a negative RDA

so at least they'll be forced to test for it in each batch

(I'm sure RFKjr will get right on that)

Some big brand names in there, "Muscle Milk" is owned by Pepsi

ps. "Mass Gainer" was a dumb thing to test but I guess control, it's just maltodextrin (a starch-like sugar)


$45 BILLION in F-35 orders have been cancelled by European countries because of the (illegal) tariff war

Nothing on the "tariff shelf" is gonna fix that, only bankrupt the country like his casino

And next war is going to be just thousands upon thousands of drones since apparently we have no way to stop them over airports and everything else


It wasnt because of Tariffs, its because its clear that they have no soverignty being apart of the F35 program. USA can try and keep up with China in sixth gen with its own money now, instead of spreading the cost amongst allies. Trump might be playing 4d chess but hes blundering queens left right and center

I was a highly trained endurance athlete my entire life and covid/long-covid absolutely destroyed all of that, permanently

After 5 years I would happily trade only a 10% performance loss for the days and nights full of nerve damage pain (neuropathy)and what seems to be 30% performance loss

BTW very relevant to your daughter's story:

the first year of long-covid I was absolutely certain I had permanent lung damage and started searching everywhere for solutions

There are two possibilities that might be hopeful for her

The first is that it might not be permanent alveoli damage (which do not regenerate in humans) but rather obstruction from a "hydrogel" that forms during active covid and takes many many months if not years to dissipate entirely

1. https://images2.imgbox.com/98/e1/gw8bO0ug_o.png

The second is much more serious and not available in the United States except experimental trials for other diseases

2. "Inhaled Tissue Plasminogen Activator" or "Nebulised Rt-PA"

https://www.google.com/search?q=Nebulised+Recombinant+Tissue...

https://academic.oup.com/qjmed/article/113/8/539/5818885 (look at the photos in this second link)

BUT there's something you can try right away

see this table of plasminogen activators

* https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5553328/table/t0001...

at the bottoms is Nattokinase and Serrapeptase

which are simple enzymes, you can buy Natto-Serra on Amazon and very very slowly perhaps over many months it might help her lungs (this is just a guess)


Thank you for the information, and I'm sorry to hear about your struggles.

> The first is that it might not be permanent alveoli damage (which do not regenerate in humans) but rather obstruction from a "hydrogel" that forms during active covid and takes many many months if not years to dissipate entirely

I didn't go into too much detail in my original post, but we think this is likely what happened to my daughter. Post-COVID, she could still go for long durations at 80% but when she pushed her limits, she would hit a wall and start to experience asthma like symptoms along with the feeling like she had mucous in her lungs that she couldn't get out. It took close to 2 years for her to stop experiencing those symptoms, at which point her competitive running peers had passed her by. She's happy to be able to enjoy running again but she did lose out on the competition part.


leaving a toxic mess is a repeated part of Musk's plan with each business

it's always privatize the profits, socialize the costs

he's doing the same thing with Starlink which is going to vaporize many thousands of toxic satellites out of LEO into the atmosphere

https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2025-space-orbit-satellit...

imagine what he's going to do on the Moon or Mars


That is a very deceptive video/article (at least the first half above the paywall). It is true that a few of these sats will have to come down each day, but the video is of a booster failure/explosion, not a normal planned obsolescence sat re-entry.

And re-entry is part of the cleanup plan. All satellites responsibly launched need a plan to deal with possible orbital waste. By decommissioning in this way, we're reducing overall impact of the constellation.

Given the immense possible good worldwide internet can provide, and the virtuous cycle it creates for the US launch industry, it's really hard to take these claims seriously.


> the immense possible good worldwide internet

It's hard to take your argument seriously if you think that's more important than preserving the environment


It is impossible to make any improvement without some impact. We're way, way past any real problems when discussing a few 100kg of metal falling into the upper atmosphere every day.


> hard to take your argument seriously if you think that's more important than preserving the environment

Okay, go convince a few billion Indians and Chinese they should wait to industrialize because the environment can’t take it.


What does this have to do with anything ITT?


> What does this have to do with anything ITT?

Growth versus preservation. India is trashing its air quality burning coal near its cities. Yet that power is lifting millions out of poverty and into the world's second-largest middle class.

Everyone would prefer clean air ceteris paribus. But for a lot of those people, economic security is "more important than preserving the environment."


I believe that an atmosphere compatible with human life is a bit more useful than internet by satelite. The fact that the impact of re-entry of satelites is absolute insane. Any good engineering company would study the whole impact of scaling up before doing so. The fact that spacex didn't do that is really worrying and regulation should come to stop what they are doing asap until the impact is better understood. Some more serious engineers at Japan aerospace are studying wooden satelite which is a quite approach to the problem.


I am not aware of threats to the atmosphere from the entry at a 100kg/day scale. And nobody is. At this point risks are hypothetical to the ozone or other layers.


if the aersols do cause any problems we're done for quite a while as they do not seem to come down. As I understand it the amount of aerosol will be quite significant in this layer of athmosphere. https://csl.noaa.gov/news/2025/427_0428.html


I'm aware of the threats to the atmosphere from repeated and frequent rocket launches.


> I'm aware of the threats to the atmosphere from repeated and frequent rocket launches

Educate us on how methalox rockets are a significant environmental concern?


> And re-entry is part of the cleanup plan

Polluting the upper atmosphere with copper, aluminium and other compounds with unknown consequences is hardly a cleanup plan


if you combine all the fallen starlink satellites and the debris/waste they produce in a year, it comes down to about less than 0.1% of what the earth receives from space in the same year


Is that true? I recall seeing a 16% or so number for the increase in mass burning up in the atmosphere.

Edit: I can’t find a source for any number for the increase. If you know could you share one?

Ah nevermind this seems solid https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S02731...



Okay, that makes sense. The reading I did indicated that the composition of the man-made mass is very different, and could greatly elevate the amount of certain elements released in the upper atmosphere, like aluminum. Is this not cause for concern?


I think the answer is "nobody knows"


Meteorites are a thing, you know.


The worst thing about space exploration is that it's not fun and optimistic like it was before this specific 2020s phase of capitalism, the best thing is that this crop of billionaires will all be dead before the real cool future stuff could happen anyway.


They're planning to live forever. All of them are investing in longevity research & some of them are young enough to live to see a few breakthroughs that might meaningfully extend their lifespan.


It actually is fun and optimistic.


Dictators discuss life-extending organ transplants https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly1w9z72r6o.amp


Xi and Putin were caught on a hot mic talking about swapping out their organs with fresh ones. I assume from their local political enemies.


To be honest, what can you talk about when you're a big shot dictator and your conversation partner is an even bigger dictator than you are?

The weather? Or the latest invasion that you've launched? That's probably boring, so it's a tricky situation.


This is getting downvoted, probably because it sounds like a loony conspiracy theory... but it isn't. https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/hot-mic-picks...


Why assume it's people who can't Google down voting and not Russian and Chinese plants. There's all kinds of topics on here that trigger a down voting campaign that works pretty well on non top comments.


> not Russian and Chinese plants

“Please don't post insinuations about astroturfing, shilling, brigading, foreign agents, and the like. It degrades discussion and is usually mistaken. If you're worried about abuse, email hn@ycombinator.com and we'll look at the data.”

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html


> This is getting downvoted

“Please don't comment about the voting on comments. It never does any good, and it makes boring reading.”

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html


There's a significant difference between "waaah meanies downvoting" and "no really folks, this is an actual thing".


Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: