It's working for me.

Why should I care about this? I don't care what google have hidden away. The best AIs are always going to be for the the most privileged.

You could just go look at the videos section.

Personally I think a lot of people just don't understand how far, both feature and performance wise Godot is compared to Unity and Unreal Engine.

Out of curiosity which brands?

All but the highest models of SanDisk have done this to me, as well as the lowest end of Western Digital, ADATA, Kingston. Same for some lesser brands that I've forgotten (not fakes, just shoddy).

Correct, there's been no ammendment to the bill, only promises it's not going to be used.

I refuse to read anything even remotely related to accessibility written by someone dumb enough to put white text on a yellow background.

I'm on desktop so maybe it's different on mobile, however I don't see a single example on their site of white text on yellow background, only black text on yellow background.

? I don't see that anywhere?

Screenshot?

Just tested sound hound and it got the first song wrong. Never known shazam to do that

You mean like drug abuse?

There are all sorts of things that I personally disagree with that I'll fight for your right to do.

If you want to have ten sexual partners at once, do a ton of drugs, generally live a hedonistic lifestyle, you do you. I'll judge you and won't associate with you, but I'm not going to stand in your way.

The hard cases are when one person’s freedom conflicts with another’s. Like my right to own firearms vs your right to be safe, or my freedom to run my polluting business vs your freedom to have a clean environment, or my freedom to ignore lockdowns in early 2020 vs your freedom to get care at a hospital with capacity.

Sure.

The ability I have to leave my house and walk around is of a different quality to the ability I have to go to the supermarket and buy some food. Positive vs negative rights, something like that. I'm feeling lazy in my explanation but probably you know it already. :)

With drug abuse I feel it's quite simple. If you want to do meth in your home, I think you're a bit daft but I'm mostly happy for you.

If you end up in a tent city under a bridge abusing passers by and committing crimes to get your next hit, well, we should punish that hard.

I don't agree anyone let scientists drive the bus. Scientists advised and the responsibility of balancing that advise against factors such as the economy was entirely the responsibility politicians and leaders.

de facto vs de jure