Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more bungie4's comments login

When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail principle. Come on admit, you've hammered in a screw before.

Good easy read though.


I'm reading it more as "If the only tool everyone has is hammers, everything will be done with nails"


And screws will be refined to lose those hard-to-hammer threads and that unreliable taper.


Come on admit, you've hammered in a screw before

Nope. Never. I take "everything" to be an exaggeration for effect. I've only hammered in peg-like or nail-like objects.

I will totally admit to pliering in a screw, however.


I do, sometimes, to get them started specially into hard wood (not necessarily hardwood), from there a driver will take over.


Drill a pilot hole of the correct size (as wide as the screw shaft without the threads). You will have a much easier time, and you won't split the wood.

https://www.ezwoodshop.com/blog/pilot-hole/perfect-pilot-hol...


Of course, I meant if you don’t have those things at your disposal at a given time.


To start a screw, I've sometimes dug out a divot with the screw or a knife. That way, at least I've removed a little material that might spread apart the grain near the surface.


Calvin and Hobbes has been the standard by which other comics are judged by me.

That being said

Hobbes: Look at the stars! Its as if the universe goes on forever and ever!

Calvin: Thats why we stay inside with our appliances.


Reminds me a lot of PT Barnums article on Money written in 1880. A lot is still applicable today.

https://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/www/barnum/moneygetting/


Nothing is easy anymore.

The stacks are so deep with millions of lines of code. When it works, its amazing. But it seems not much just 'works' anymore.

Compared to the 80-90's. You were very close to the metal. Comparatively speaking.


#1 Red flag discoverable during your interview.

Ask if this is a new position or refilling and existing position. With some discovery, you'll find if the churn rate on the job offered is high. If so, run. Something is very wrong.


This is a very good question, saying this as some one who just took a job with a high churn rate


I was in the same boat. Now, one of my Pi's is running PiHole and I couldn't be happier with it.


I'll be traveling from Ontario to Yosemite and back this summer in my Tacoma. I have exactly the same setup. It works.

I've been deeply interested in going nomadic full time for more than a decade, despite it only recently becoming a thing. Family, job obligations combined with a relatively low cost arrangement for living expenses finds me plunked down firmly.

If my wife and I split, god forbid, you'll find me on the road.

PS: Their are no construction standards for trailers/rv's. Their are built as cheaply as possible. I'd much rather do the van thing if only for the structural integrity.


We have a Thor Class C on a Sprinter chassis. Chassis is awesome, if you have the means I highly recommend one. Thor build quality (and RV quality in general) is laughably bad. I'm confident the "bones" are good, but what's screwed to the frame is screwed on as quickly as possible. I've been through just about every inch of that thing while I was installing and running wire for solar and a big inverter. If it's behind a screwed-on panel (IOW, customer will never see it), there is leftover shit everywhere. Saw dust, wire ends, whatever.

I'm surprised when I go to unscrew something and find that the screw was actually screwed in straight. I'm dead serious, there aren't a dozen straight screws in the whole thing (well, there are now). Assuming the $WHATEVER even got a screw; I keep forgetting to run to Home Depot for screws for those brackets that are hanging by two wobbly screws.

So, yeah, build quality on RVs is shit. But if you can do your own van, you can redo anything in an RV. And the RV is already plumbed and wired, mostly. You can fix the stuff they missed. :-) Despite my complaints, I've put in far less effort correcting Thor's mistakes than I would into building my own van.


> Their are no construction standards for trailers/rv's. Their are built as cheaply as possible.

https://www.rvia.org/standards-regulations

If you look you can find RV's that are built to last. The vast majority are built as cheaply as possible though.


Membership is voluntary.


Well, the wife left me and my kid is graduating HS this year... that's actually part of the motivation there.

As for the "cheap"... yeah, that is true, but I just don't see the DIY people ever getting things as light as the RV manufacturers... and that is a big deal when driving.


The only way to win the game is not to play.


I moved from Toronto decades ago. Since then I've rejected offers constantly because, quite frankly, IMO, Toronto is a hole. I now find myself living north of Toronto, with limited career options but much happier near the 'outdoors' with my family.

Makes your choices, takes your chances.


As someone from Northern Ontario who moved to SW Ontario for work as a software dev - how did you do this? I'd love to move back home, but there are very few jobs, and the ones that do exist are dramatically lower salaries with outdated approaches (~45k, Visual Basic or C++98 vs ~80K, whatever web tech I want). Do you work remotely?


The trick is not look for work in a startup/dev environment, but in the institutional and corporate environment. Their are jobs and the payscale you desire, just not in the quantities you desire.

For instance, I was at my last position for 6 years. The last 3 of which, I was actively looking for work. It took a while, but I'm making equiv to Toronto wages in a new position.

But yes, the majority of postings are in the low rent payscale neighbourhood. Which is weird, because you'd think to attract skilled talent away from T.O., the scale would in fact be higher.


Cheers, when time time comes I'll bug whatever local hospitals, banks, education institutions and admin centres exist.


A nested if statement approximately 75 levels deep all because the author didn't understand that an ID can be unique. So he manually checked the value (which meant it could never be changed without a code change).

He did't understand the concept of a join. So he'd nest queries in VBScript with join key supplied from the outer query to the inner. Row by row. Essentially, a manual cursor.

Same programmer wrote an ASP portal app. The login of which got most of its security because they didn't know how to iterate over a returned dataset. Same code would set a cookie for access IN THE PRESENCE of a password. It could be wrong, you would still get access. Worse, the logout function didn't delete the access cookie, it just redirected you to the login page. Meaning you could impersonate anybody if knew thier username. Included admin.

I once corrected bug, by using a view. I sent him the view. He had no concept what a view was "That's like a stored procedure right?'. I'm shocked he knew what a stored procedure was.

He's still in business and the software is deployed worldwide. He refuses to fix it. He's a multi-millionaire.


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: