Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | brianolson's comments login

If you want to dedicate a VM to it, bsky Personal Data Server has a pretty easy install

https://github.com/bluesky-social/pds


95% of end users don't care; but Bluesky has the right bits built in anyway. There's a grand central aggregator of all 13 million accounts, but it's not _special_, someone else could run one (several hobbiests are processing this level of data). Migration works* (and works better than Mastodon, all your history and network move even better than a masto server move) (*okay, it's a weird command line tool at the moment, but as soon as someone cares that'll get cleaned up). You can run your own Personal Data Server and hook it in to the bsky network and then everyone can see your posts and interact with them. It's newer, only a couple years old, but all the right parts are headed in the right direction.


atproto PDSes are like blog servers with RSS (but better) and bsky.app is the prevailing RSS reader. It's an open protocol because anyone can host a source and anyone can run a different reader.


OP is a link to the atproto site because it got a major new revision within the last week



Does BlueSky have a legal representative in Brazil?


BlueSky don't have any justice issue. Because of this, don't need representative yet.


A lot of Brazilian users are posting "I am using a VPN to access X" on BlueSky so the judge will probably order BlueSky to turn over their IP addresses(like he did in orders to X) so they can be fined $9000 a day.


To be fair, that order would only matter if Bluesky is logging and storing user IPs. I don't know of any technical reason for needing to track that based on the AT Protocol, they could avoid the entire problem by not tracking that data (assuming they currently do).


The judge would probably force the legal rep to log ip addresses the next time those users access BlueSky under threat of jail time and frozen bank accounts like he did for Twitters rep.


Is it not a problem to you that a judge would go after legal counsel personally based on how the counsel represents the will of their client?

Personally I see that as a very serious problem. Its one thing if it can be proven that legal counsel knowingly breaks the law. Its entirely different if the lawyer simply disagrees with the judge. Judges shouldn't be able to threaten counsel with jail time of seizure of assets simply because the judge disagrees with the legal argument a client wishes to make.


You probably need to store user IPs to moderate.

At least on Mastodon, any instance stores IP, so....


Are IP addresses really helpful in moderation? Moderation usually pertains to the content itself, meaning you would want to block certain content from being posted regardless of the IP that sends a request. Maybe you extend moderation to include banning users, but at that point you have more specific data than IP addresses (like usernames or user IDs).

You can target a list of suspected spammer IPs, though that's often a losing game of cat and mouse where you end up missing some spammers and catching legitimate users in the crossfire.


I know that for Instagram/Threads, IP is very key to their moderation. Once they ban a user with that IP, any other account from that IP will also be banned (or something like it), it's fundamental to avoid ban evasion.

For Mastodon, all of this is manual, so it will be up to moderators on the server....


Give it a little time.


Who will the justice send a censorship request to?


They won't, cos it's STILL not censorship, much though the right-of-center machinery would love everyone to believe it is.


Ok, removal request then.


Bluesky have contact information in their site..

But Brazil justice is already in contact with then, as long as they offer a place for justice to send court orders and comply with then, as they have done so far, they wont have any problems..


what keeps them from banning bsky too in the coming months?


Compliance with court orders?


Because Bsky will censor. They are celebrating X not censoring with all these posts boasting about the numbers.


Isn't Bluesky (I know nothing about it: heard about it for the first time on HN following the X ban in totalitarian Brazil) decentralized?


in theory it is.. but the only site that implement their protocol is bluesky.social


By not enabling blatant (harmful) misinformation accounts to proliferate in the platform, just like X/Twitter did.

And of course, complying with the law and courts order


Maybe don't finish! Maybe you did the interesting part and that's enough.

Is there something about finishing that's interesting? Some value intrinsic to you in finishing?


Rust async/await is less nice than Go coroutines. There are things you can't do and weird rules around Rust async code. Every Go chan allows multiple readers and multiple writers, but Rust stdlib and tokio default to single-reader queues.


Bitcoin is still wasting gigawatts every year, but later blockchains are literally a million times more efficient. If the current generations of AI turn out to be useful, maybe someone will figure it out an efficiency optimization.


It's not. It's not about efficiency. Compute-per-watt will certainly be better in other systems. This is about pushing a small system as fast as possible because it's easier to program for a small system. A few problems are 'embarrassingly parallel', but lots have substantial overhead as parallelism increases so running each core as fast as possible is a win for some problems.


going way back: Science Fair in High School landed me summer internships that rolled over into my first job out of college. ("Science and Engineering Fair" project was building robots with microcontrollers) I think it was the proof that I could do that kind of work in a self directed way that made them notice me.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: