There are three main parameters: stand/sit, front-to-back/back-to-front, front-access/reverse-access (i.e. between the legs or behind the back)
Back-to-front is a health risk for 50% of us, and just a bit gross for the rest. So rule that out.
Wiping hand between the legs is awkward and requires that the thumb (a notoriously larger-than-the-other-digits digit) is used as the primary wiping vane.
Sit + wiping hand behind the back + wipe front to back allows use of the index finger, but requires an awkward lean and lift of one cheek to gain access.
Stand + wiping hand behind the back + wipe front to back is, therefore, the only sensible option. Additionally it makes checking the bowlean return value indicated on the paper much easier.
Not a significant concern because it's what your digestive system is designed for. Pulling out the materials it needs from a slurry.
Deinionized water on the other hand immediately chemically to pull in ions. So same action, but with a more powerful mechanism. You'd probably have to drink a lot of deionized water to cause issues, plus water reionizes pretty quickly in air, and it takes terrible.
There is no consensus [1] except that exclusively drinking demineralized water could cause issues. So like everything moderation matters. I only use it for drinking water not cooking for example.
I often thought: It seems like flushing first makes much of the cleaning product run right into the water rather than sticking to the bowl, but there must be a reason they say to do it.
Bought new Converse shoes which were specifically marketed as walking shoes. 5-6 weeks of ~20 minutes moderate walking per day and they both had holes in the soles.
Went back to the Converse store and got told "no refunds". We eventually got our money back, but not without an argument. It pays to understand consumer protection laws where you live.
I don't have an ADHD diagnosis, but I have some suspicions.
I find I want to be doing things. Those things must be immediately (or very quickly at least) and consistently rewarding, or I'll stop. That much is, as far as I've found in the last few decades, an unchangeable fact.
That pretty much rules out studying.
You can learn by doing things too, obviously, but the early stages of learning programming are either sensible small steps (hello world, what's a function, etc etc) or gigantic unrealistic moon-of-an-exoplanet-shot projects (I'm going to build the next World of Warcraft by myself by next weekend).
The sensible small steps are exciting and give the doing things successfully rush at first, but that goes away fast and you need more.
You do hello world (wow I made the computer do something!). Learn how to use some conditions (wow I made the computer decide something!). Learn about libraries (wow so I can just stitch a bunch of these together and build the next Big App!). Start working on your big idea, quickly realise you're not going to be getting the success hits fast enough. Do something else "for a bit" and never touch your project again.
I'm fairly sure the only reason I managed to learn to code was that my first job in tech support was both easy and boring, and automating parts of that job was more fun than actually doing the job. Productive things become much easier when they're procrastination from something less fun.
It's taken me ten years, but I'm finally at the point now where I've built up a big enough skillset that I can take on projects that I'm interested in, and make progress fast enough that I get my fix and can stick with them.
There is also the part where the machine I sit down at to attempt to learn programming also happens to be the same machine where I do banking, budgeting, YouTube, Reddit, HN, porn, gaming, socialising, falling down Wikipedia rabbit holes etc. etc.
There are lots of distractions for the distractable mind.
>Productive things become much easier when they're procrastination from something less fun.
Same with all lease formulas. You don't have to worry about anything, but you do pay at keast 30% more. For some this can be a good thing but it's not cheap.
Wordt lease offenders I've seen so far: bikes. You repay it in about a year.
Yes and it is an interesting view of how humans interact. Bot was told to be friendly and polite. When humans are instructed to do so, and would be able to keep the promise, then when somebody would tell them 2+2=5 they could also say maybe I'm wrong, sorry about misleading you that 2+2=4, perhaps I'm missing some information etc.
One of the factors seems to be that in cultures I know it is usually not polite to just say "you are wrong". HN or good coders teams are niches where this does not apply, which great.
Regardless, you can instruct it to be a teacher instead or whatever, there is still much space for improvement without any breakthrough. I'm still in awe just how powerful it is after only consuming text, never seeing any picture, 3d world, physics etc.
