What kinds of workloads do you use this infra for, if you don't mind sharing?

This sounds exactly like what I'm looking. Care to share the brand&model?

AOOSTAR R1

Is that not possible today with the self hosting option? https://atproto.com/guides/self-hosting

That's my question! If I run that, can I show posts that bluesky has banned? Can I allow people to respond to any post they choose?

As a Canadian who doesn't follow daily news, I'm very curious to know what you're referring to in your last paragraph. Care to elaborate?

Use your words.

he says he is not watching news, so he does not care,

or he has schizophrenia and he cares but not cares,

or he is passive aggressive.

so which one you need me to address?

if you have need to downvote . please tell me what exactly im not understanding to make me a better person.

> I selected the following libraries off the top of my head with three criteria: all have more than 500 stars and are in active use.

This sentence bothered me way more that it should've, for some reason.

Ah! You caught me in an editing discontinuity.

You might like this and or find it inspiring, in case you haven't seen it already:

Saving Voyager 1! - Bruce Waggoner at !!Con 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dF_9YcehCZo

Edit: Also, please do share when it's playable :)

All that's missing is a "Happy [day-of-the-week]!" greeting

> There's boundless libraries to make Python more functional, use stricter typing, or reduce the amount of side effects it can cause.

What are some examples of a library that can limit or prevent side effects of a piece of python code? I could use one right now.

Ah yes, the infamous Gear Acquisition Syndrome

> You literally cannot add too many comments to test code

In my opinion, almost every developer I've worked with who advocated for generous amounts of comments has overestimated their (and or others') ability to write good quality comments.

Obvious ones like `a = b; // set a to b` while useless are also mostly harmless, but I've been lead astray by outright factually wrong comments, many more times than I can count. I certainly don't feel confident in my own ability to not write factually incorrect comments. So yeah, I'd rather the code do the talking.

That’s why your comments should be on things you know to be factual like WHY you made a certain decision. Things like that cannot always be communicated by good variables and functions.

I suspect they mean in tests, not in general code as hints about testing. A comment block that explains a bit why that test is doing what it's doing can be amazing.