I think "The Gong Show" was an old tv show about amateur talents. Sometimes good, most of the time terrible and hilariously unaware. Not sure if that was what was intended here.
So is the GP criticizing Python? If yes, I am curious to know why. No, I am not here to defend Python. The constant runtime exceptions due to typing mistakes is so tiring.
My use case is generating a very high rate (10k e/s up to 100k e/s) of JSON-NL events from samples of JSON-encoded log data (JSON-NL to be exact). Is this supported in OSS Gretel?
FYI, I'd built a hand-crafted generator using JSONNet templates and Golang, but I really wanted something that could model source data distributions accurately. The use case is large-scale load testing of customer workloads without requiring actual data.
We're currently beta testing something that fits this use case directly. The models we have today are really great at capturing the original distribution, but they're not always the fastest. This new stuff will change that, feel free to reach out (maybe on our slack?) and we can see if we can get something working
Also, shameless plug, we're pretty proud of our generated anything's at Gretel[1]. It's tabular, text, and time series for now - but we recently had a blog post that shows how generated data can be useful for downstream ML [2]
Thanks for the feedback, I was hoping the course would be something of a redemption.
I self published the book to prove I could do something like that. It got much more traction than I had planned and, in hindsight, I wish I had paid for editing and formatting as a minimum.
As for the quality of the paperback, that was unfortunately out of my control as I used Amazon's print on demand services. Definitely a painful lesson for me.
In any case, I appreciate this comment and others here. I'm definitely working towards much higher substance with increased polish. :)