>Instead, they can introduce a whole new class of bug that's way harder to debug
That sounds like a new opportunity for a startup that will collect hundreds of millions a of dollars, brag about how their new AI prototype is so smart that it scares them, and devliver nothing
>And it will do all of this while consuming truly shocking amounts of energy.
You need to lookup how much an "average" human consumes. When I replace 2 humans with a ChatGPT subscription, I can guarantee you that OpenAI is generating less co2 than what these two interns were creating with their transport to the office (and back). That's before we consider things like the 25 years it took to raise and train them or the very expensive tastes (eg. Travelling around the world) they get after they earn a large salary.
Well, the first thing they said was that it at least removed the need for their commute, which might be something. In general, it does take resources to create the conditions for people to work. Maybe there will be room for new value for the existing people as a result.
Simply working from home removes the need for their commute. And we all know how most of the executive and management class feels about working from home.
Lots of documents have to be styled in a very particular way. These rules aren’t laws of physics, they’re made by humans to make other people’s lives more miserable than it’s necessary
Absolute most of the time what is offered by markdown is enough.
When doing my thesis I was asking myself “is it really that important to use 16pt font or 14pt one or this is a made up rule because someone said so many years ago”
They openly admit that insults can also get you a fine and have your computer confiscated. And this isn't a weird conspiracy theory, they are proud of it.
That doesn't really solve the problem of your bag not arriving at destination. So far my ratio is 3 out of 14 that had bagage problems when I didn't bring them in with me as carry on.
If you fly multiple hops, there is no way to guarantee this, service quality varies wildly ie across Europe.
Some airports are known to be 'black holes' for luggage, from dealings with Swissport who handles lost&found everywhere, they mentioned that Fiumicino airport near Rome didn't have stellar reputation to say politely, and Barcelona wasn't that great neither. Had luggage lost on both in rather annoying way - both of them didn't have a clue where it was for more than a week, started saying goodbye to all rather costly equipment like paraglider set in it.
But I've seen stuff get lost in places like Vienna multiple times, so one can't draw any simple conclusions. I see it as a massive room for improvement and automation via 'AI', but that should have been done a decade ago, ie automated barcode scanning isn't novel tech.
It does seem to have improved in general. (From a small sample size as I don't check luggage unless I have to.) United's baggage tracking in their app seems pretty reliable and I toss in an AirTag as a backup which also works well.
That has definitely improved. My bags used to get lost (well, more delayed than lost) nearly every time I connected through Paris CDG. Now it's been a long time since that has happened.
It gets worse, if you try to see the url from a phone, there is a good chance it will load the page for you to show a preview. They think it's helpful.... that motherfucking preview on the iPhone forced me to spend a full hour in training because they think I clicked on the link.
Now I send all of these types of email to spam and don't give a fuck. Anything "internal" with a link to click goes to spam unless it's directly from my boss. Turns out 99% of it is not that important.
How does hiding videos help anyone? It's not like the footage magicaly disappears when you show it to the public and investigators can't use it. We live in the digital era, it takes like 7 clicks to share the footage to the entire world. Are pilots and engineers around the world gonna be better at preventing this type of disaster if we all make sure they never ever get to see it?
Pilots and engineers will be better at preventing this type of disastr after and only after a review has been done. Just like a trial, seeing footage earlier and in a different venue than the "review room" can color opinions inappripriately and actually hender the search for truth.
If you lose your house keys, you don't have to give up your house and all your furniture. You are allowed to pay a locksmith or break a windows, you own it after all.
