Do you think a normal person can "just" build multi story, multi tenant housing on a whim? For a non-multimillionaire, that'd at least be the entire life savings of families
i’m using perplexity pro set to deep research with this prompt:
read the hackernews comments on this link to understand how someone's digital footprint might affect their ability to get hired. Then do that research against me, <first last>, to help me understand what is available about me out there that could help or harm my ability to compete. See if there are any internet handles that you can associate with me, if so, research them too.
There's so much to do other than drinking. Tennis, badminton, hiking, or even just walking the coastline.
I find the problem much more to do with the availability of entertainment. Before social media and YouTube, you just got bored staying at home all day and would naturally go out and socialize. Nowadays, everyone is just plugged into a never ending stream of TikTok brain rot.
Yes, I agree. I do all those too (except badminton). But, it doesn't have to be either or. Each listed activity is different from the other as well. So is "having drinks with friends".
Also, most of those activities aren't really a Friday/Saturday 10PM activity. Thinking about university days, I had 6-9PM classes on Friday, then go out with my friends to banter, watch people and just shoot the shit at the bars. Obviously it's not super healthy, but we're not talking about binge drinking 10 pints.
> The following platforms unfortunately no longer get prebuilt binaries for
download at syncthing.net and on GitHub, due to complexities related to
cross compilation with SQLite:
dragonfly/amd64
illumos/amd64 and solaris/amd64
linux/ppc64
netbsd/*
openbsd/386 and openbsd/arm
windows/arm
I'm surprised they're dropping windows/arm considering that seems to be the direction things are moving in.
I don't understand why they chose to use github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3 instead of modernc.org/sqlite
(minor correction, Obsidian broke the 3rd party sync, not insomnia)
Point still stands.
I agree it's an annoying problem, but it's hard to see a way around it. The developers was that they need some way to fund development. Sync tends to be the up sell target since it's more for power users willing to pay.
There are quite a few open source Insomnia and Postman clones. Since most of them operate on config and workspaces, I think syncthing is good enough for this use case at least.
I regret open sourcing my reverse engineering of Obsidian Sync. I did it mostly for personal use but thought it might be useful for others. After a bit of cat and mouse, they fixed all the "vulnerabilities" that let you change the sync and publish endpoints and now I'm still stuck using a very outdated version. I recently found another way to get it working on IOS again but definitely not publishing it.
Why do they consider it a "vulnerability" that you can change configuration of software running on your own computer? I've heard a lot of good things about Obsidian before, but hearing that basically burns it all up and means I'm going to strongly recommend nobody buy anything from them anymore.
Obsidian distributes their software for free, and makes money on a core plugin called Obsidian Sync (note that it is not open source). Obsidian Sync relies on their cloud to offer e2ee file sync.
Obsidian also has a rich plugin ecosystem with lots of open source plugins that are available and serve the same purpose (and you can use gdrive, dropbox, etc too).
It makes sense to me that they released a proprietary privacy and security focused plugin (that is their core business) and they don't want other plugins to be able to arbitrarily change the server that their plugin is pointed at.
Suppose they have a government customer who is using Obsidian Sync and the sync URL can be changed easily via configuration changes -- now the customer believes they are using Obsidian Sync, but actually their data is going somewhere else.
I don't think you would be surprised to find that e.g. a dropbox daemon has protections to make sure it is pointing at dropbox.com. Why would you expect Obsidian to be different?
(disclaimer: I work on a different plugin that adds file sync and collaboration features to Obsidian)
My opinion is that they should have a rule such that plugins from the official list can't modify the sync url to prevent abuse and phishing but the user should still be able to do whatever they want. The process for manually adding a plugin is already enough friction for users to be aware what they're doing is not "safe"
Flashbacks to the time I copied iCloud pointers/placeholders thinking I was actually copying files with actual data. Oh well, who needed those few years of documents anyway.
This gets complicated when you want your vault accessible across linux/windows/android/macos/ipad.
The ipad is the real stick in the mud and I don't want to deal with an icloud staging zone for everything else, or try to get icloud syncing on linux/android.
I wanted it to work on IOS. None of those were viable.
In terms of why not my own plugin, that's just pure incompetence. I don't know TypeScript that well while getting the API done only took a few days. I tried working on a plugin later on for sync but found the docs difficult to follow. In the end, it wasn't worth the effort and I've gone back to just neovim and syncthing. For IOS, I'm sideloading my own app written with fyne (Go) but functionality is really basic.
