I've found a solution which I presume is the one you have in mind, though it's worth noting that it doesn't work in Firefox at the moment.

Feel free to add a link with your answer later on, just in case you came up with something different.

You're looking for: http://eslint.org/docs/rules/prefer-const

It does exactly what you describe :)

This looks like it would be very useful to me. A pet peeve of mine is when an application does not use a monochrome icon in the menu bar. I don't suppose you could offer a monochrome option for the percentage, turning it the same colour as the icon?

You can disable the colors in the settings tab. It should work both for classic and dark menu bar styles.

Based on their blog there are no more tablets to ship, but if the words of an unfamiliar HN user mean anything to you, I can verify that I received the first half of my refund two days ago.

While it is hardly a discoverable feature, you can override custom context menus (at least in Firefox) by holding SHIFT and clicking.

Many thanks. I wonder how many other features I'm missing out on..

I have found it to work without issues in Wine.

Since you've already brought it up as "blabbing" - why do you dismiss basic income as a solution?

Because it seems to imply a post-work, not a post-full-employment society.

We're still going to have a lot of jobs in the mid-term, probably even long-term. 70%, 60% of the working populace in the mid-term maybe, and not too few of those in menial/blue collar jobs. We still need to fill these jobs, and a generous basic income would make these jobs highly unpopular. So we can either set a basic income that is not high enough to solve the problem it was trying to solve, or we create a situation like in Saudi Arabia – where all the undesirable jobs are taken by foreign jobbers (from nations without basic income, or war zones, or…), while the natives grow fat and lazy.

Not exactly an economic policy I'd have expected from the Left.

"We still need to fill these jobs, and a generous basic income would make these jobs highly unpopular. So we can either set a basic income that is not high enough to solve the problem it was trying to solve, or we create a situation like in Saudi Arabia – where all the undesirable jobs are taken by foreign jobbers "

Or we could just let the wage for those undesirable jobs rise to a level that someone will take them, even though they're getting the basic income.

Why shouldn't someone get paid a lot of money for (e.g.) trimming my toenails? Someone else would have to pay me a lot of money to do that.

Basic income doesn't have to be set at post-work levels to provide benefits to an employment-starved population. Even a small amount will reduce the number of hours that people are willing to work.

There is actually a growing middle class - the Donju - earning money through the black market. They certainly have enough resources to (over)feed themselves - and buy expensive electronics.

As for the larger population, while most of the country still suffers from food shortages, starvation is not the problem it was in the 90s.

See for example: http://uk.reuters.com/article/2015/06/04/uk-northkorea-chang...

You'll find it in southern Sweden - "Jellyfish Invasion Forces EON to Shut Down Swedish Nuclear Plant" :-)