The Be would be inside the (radioactive) reactor vessel, which already has extremely strict isolation requirements. I believe it's accessed and maintained with robotics.
As for the change, I'm just an interested amateur, so shouldn't go into details and please take this with a big grain of salt, but I've heard it was a result of proposed scenario(s) that some do not regard as realistic.
> you would need 100% efficiency to be able to breed your own tritium
How so? As I understand it, the breeding reaction is exothermic (Li-6 + n -> He-4 + T) so all you need are neutrons, for which (as someone pointed out to me two years ago[1]) neutron multipliers would be used.
Here's some articles about the neutron multipliers. You can go through them and see that they are all talking about feasibility and theoretical considerations. It's not just as simple as shooting some neutrons at a block of lead of beryllium on one side and more neutrons come on the other side.
No, I agree, but you specifically mentioned "science-fiction" in the second post, and implicitly denied even their existence in the first post. I think there's a reasonable distance between that, and economic considerations
/ the fact that test hardware has yet to exist that's presented in those papers.
Three years in, and it's working great. We're different people with different work styles, but get the job done with tons of respect on both sides. The only difference is that the friendship is perhaps at a sightly further remove than it used to be.
People said it might go badly; they said the same about living with a different colleague, and that also went perfectly for me.
It is a stylistic device that serves as a sort of emphasis. Rhetorically censoring all or part calls attention to it as profanity.
You hear an analogous effect used a lot in spoken speech (definitely in the UK, not sure about USA), for example, "ff-<beat>-in' thing". This stresses it in a way, similar to varying tone or volume, that would be missed in a flat reading.
That's an interesting theory, but I don't believe any of it.
There are many better ways of calling attention, or adding emphasis to profanity without having to resort to making it look less profane.
And in the specific case of the comment I replied to it does not look like they were particularly angry or frustrated enough to apply this technique of yours to just one word, while the rest of the sentence is fairly innocuous. And I further doubt that if any (neutral) literary analysis were to be applied to that comment, that people would think that stormking was so angry that they were actually trying to apply any kind of emphasis the profanity.
Emphasis not just in the narrow sense of showing intense emotion, but rather the general concept of giving a sentence rhythm and prosody, often to highlight a wry or ironic situation. Your analysis is correct that GP likely did not do it entirely to invite readers to get annoyed on their behalf, but rather to humourously focus on the contrast between the arduity of setting up and waiting for a dual-boot on one hand, and playing a "f*cking game" on the other.
> There are many better ways of calling attention
Written expression is a form of art, not a formula with a correct answer.
Are you thinking just of roundabouts that include a raised middle and/or central reservations on approaching roads? In general, roundabouts need no more space and cost than a regular road would, see e.g. https://goo.gl/maps/Y6jzLq5SuYzMMf2a6
> Climate is always changing. Why is climate change of concern now?
> All major climate changes, including natural ones, are disruptive. Past climate changes led to extinction of many species, population migrations, and pronounced changes in the land surface and ocean circulation. The speed of the current climate change is faster than most of the past events, making it more difficult for human societies and the natural world to adapt.
> Why be concerned about a degree or two change in the average global temperature?
> A degree or two change in average global temperature might not sound like much to worry about, but relatively small changes in the earth’s average temperature can mean big changes in local and regional climate, creating risks to public health and safety, water resources, agriculture, infrastructure, and ecosystems. Among the many examples cited by the 2018 National Climate Assessment are an increase in heat waves and days with temperatures above 90°F; more extreme weather events such as storms, droughts, and floods; and a projected sea level rise of 1 to 4 feet by the end of this century, which could put certain areas of the country underwater.
I dimly remember trying this five years ago and it being a bit of a mess. IIRC it was that date picker widgets in browsers presented in a different format to what the Accept-Language header suggests (a killer when you're trying to render static and editable dates in the same table), or users were confused seeing dates in their preferred format after being linked from a site that disregards them, etc. Perhaps the situation has improved by now.
Seems like requiring the date author to think about widgets is too much of burden. Better to just leave it as text and have an annotation layer that optionally says "this substring is a date in format X with timezone Y" which viewers can optionally re-render according to their preferences.
That way if neither option is exercised, it's still just text.
While skin-in-the-game is a good tool for problems of this general class, the editor has said that refundable fees would not be workable in this particular case due to issues with payment providers[1].
As someone that enjoys trying to make up inversions on the spot, and laments that chord charts only ever seem to acknowledge open chords and E/A-shape barres, that command line tool looks fantastic. Is it available to download anywhere?
(P.S. I can't work out the tuning in the score you posted, but it looks like another user posting above[1] made a tool that provides a fingering -> chord name solver?)
You can get the source for that command line tool here [1]. It's a single file C program that just uses stdio.h and stdlib.h and inputs from stdin and outputs to stdout, so should be easy to get working on anything that has a C compiler and a terminal with a simple "cc chord.c".
There's a little bit of documentation in this comment from a couple years ago [2]. There's a source link in that comment too, but that is to an older version. I added a couple more chord types later so use [1] instead.
Note: I'm not sure I got all the chord types quite right, so be sure to look at the notes it says are in the chord you asked for to make sure it got the right notes.
Check out the whole post that [2] was a comment on. There were several other people who also commented sharing guitar or music tools they had developed.
As for the change, I'm just an interested amateur, so shouldn't go into details and please take this with a big grain of salt, but I've heard it was a result of proposed scenario(s) that some do not regard as realistic.