Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Vexs's commentslogin

You know, I reckon if you serve up smut or instructions on bomb creation or something they stop hammering you...

I think that they actually do. I remember either some discussion (so a HN post) or a HN comment actually talking about it. Oh I should've favourited it but yes this (sort of) actually works (Maybe someone can test it?)

I don't really know that this is avoidable without buckets of work and probably legal issues on behalf of core's (or anyone's) engineers- it's really just something that plagues hardware in general.

Hell, lots of sensors/etc these days are running fairly complicated software that's totally opaque.


I don't think _anyone_ who's buying the new pebble watches is to some degree not interested in software, and probably pretty interested in open-source community work. It's a wildly niche userbase, and this sort of thing is going to put crazy pressure on Eric and co, I imagine.

Still keeping my preorder, but damn dude this kinda sucks.


> restart required a hardware security module (HSM) smart card.

Out of curiosity, does anyone know why? My guess would be the PW DB would be encrypted with some token generated from this card.

I've had lots of "I have a secret and the server needs it" type problems but I've never been very happy with my solutions- smart cards seem like potentially an elegant solution.


This article highlights exactly why a HSM may be potentially elegant, but also really really dependant on embedding the process for using it in your operational processes (which would include performing that operation regularly to ensure it still works and that knowledge of its use is retained).

For a 'best effort' hosted internal service, this is not a good choice.


Figure 3 from the report- that's an Adafruit sensor module on a 3d printed bit of plastic with a teensy-brand microcontroller just sitting in there! Actually, the entire electronics enclosure appears printed.

Very funny to see in what I assume is a million-dollar product.


On-brand, though. And speak some respect to Adafruit's name! Lady Ada's product isn't what failed.


What was the water condensation situation like in this submarine? Semi bare electronics sounds very very bad.


This is a camera outside the sub, and the electronics are inside sealed enclosure. If that had any leak for water to get in some conformal coating isn't going to save you, it will get pancaked.

Of course random arduino module and teensy used for product is amateur hour, even for low volume production. They must have crazy margins on that camera and producing custom board is very cheap.


>They must have crazy margins on that camera and producing custom board is very cheap.

It's expensive in time and expertise to do a custom board, and to debug a custom board. All to what, save 20$ on a bom which might not even be 1% of the profit per unit?

Far more efficient to just ship the dev board. They could have perhaps picked a better dev setup to start with, but if it looks stupid and it works...


Point isn't to save BOM cost, margins are high already and they can eat into them.

Unless they are making literally less than 10 of those, custom board will be easier to manufacture than that mess of dev boards and more reliable than random wires and headers all over the place. Plus they can spend money where it makes sense, using better regulators etc.


Only if you happen to have the relevant skill set.

Speaking as someone capable of designing the mechanical hardware and who is broadly electrically savvy but who is most definitely not an embedded engineer: I could bang out a few hundred hacked together dev boards in week, but doing a custom board would take me a few months. Starting with reading 'Prototyping PCBs for Dummies'.


or just hire a guy that knows how to do their job.


Also it's actually simpler than it might seem, especially if you are not doing anything high-power or high-frequency (which, again, if it's a bunch of breakout boards connected over 0.1inch headers they clearly aren't).

Watch a few YT videos, copy-paste the reference schematics for all those boards, delete what you don't use and you are almost done :)


Any money spent coating those semi-bare electronics would have been wasted. There's an engineering lesson to be taught here, I'm sure.


Lol, and the censored controller is a teensy 3.2


It's a bit silly IMO, but USB PD EPR _can_ support 24v and 48v- for charging laptops, I believe. The day I see a server rack with a pair of USBCs plugged into it is a far day off I hope though.


Didn't know, thanks for the info... I still have to see a power supply capable of delivering those voltages on USB-C though. All the ones I've seen can output 5V, 12V and 19V.


The dude tests basically anything and everything, and gives them generally pretty reasonable goes at a proper test. Sure, it's far off from an industry standard in a lot of cases, but unlike the industry (generally) he does side by side comparisons.


Some of his tests are like comparing RAM by temperature. They just make no sense.


I've learned from watching vintage computer repair videos on youtube that touching chips on a running system and looking for a hot one is a common troubleshooting technique.


Fun fact if you take a board out of a Burroughs B6700/B6800 that you think is bad (has a bad chip) if you drop it flat on the floor, chips side up from 36" (about belt height) 9 times out of 10 the lid on the bad chip will fly off. Turns out the heat from a failing chip heats enough to release the glue.

YMMV on fixing a now 50 year old computer.


midjourney and discord have a number of internal agreements- they're not on there for free anymore...


It's a bit of a convolution, but let's say we've got some iterator of unknown size and we want to have a prime each iteration. We can do the following in python, which saves us from having to pre-compute the primes _or_ know how long `some_iterator` is.

primes = gen_primes() for item, prime in zip(some_iterator, primes):


Please god no. So much info is already getting dumped to discord and nowhere else making searching or archiving impossible, we don't need more of that.


This is a selling point of Discord. The ability to have a conversation without "researchers" being able to search for it for decades.


For many of us, Discord’s model is an anti-pattern.

Try searching for something when you don’t recall where you said it (dc server or DM)


Search the .CSVs yourself?


Doesn't Discord keep the data forever? And potentially sell it to "researchers"?


Discord no doubt keeps every conversation ever typed on their servers. they might toss out something huge like a movie file but text compresses -very- well.


Sending something to discord is like sending it to /dev/null except that it is also diverted into the mailbox of Big Brother, with you having only very limited access to it on their whim.


that's part of the appeal nowadays, it seems websites and apps don't see the point of making themselves freely searchable anymore


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: