Because to do backbreaking work, labour demands $200 million.
the current low price of produce is subsidised by cheap illegal immigrant labour. Just like how the spartans spent their time being warriors while their slaves toiled the field.
> You can't admit fault or imply so. The legal department will veto it.
They should do it anyway. After the Challenger and Columbia disasters, there were major public changes at NASA. If there are none at Boeing now, we have a huge problem (since the number of deaths is an order of magnitude larger!).
>The only change that's "needed" is increase in affordable housing to the lower- and middle-class which forms the support fabric without which the town can't exist.
and how are they going to do that without allowing the city to be denser?
At this point you can figure out if a technology to reduce atmospheric carbon level will be effective or not by looking if oil companies are investing in it.
This is not true though. Security is about mitigating threat at some cost. There are some threats you can't mitigate cost-effectively. Some are unmitigable at all.
Then you can just run all your naughty words through the russian styliser.