Last I did benchmarking, a vast majority of memory allocations were strings that were typically all dereferenced right away and cleaned up in GEN1 GC. I had contemplated whether string pooling would be useful or not but never got around to it. Would be interesting to see if you could get reduced memory usage and potentially better performance by decreasing pressure on the GC during the GEN1 phase.

(Side note: this was when I was co-maintaining MCPC so was typically with mods installed and they heavily use NBT which I suspect is where a lot of that string allocation was happening.)

You are correct. Both links that he posted are talking about reinfection. So prior infection + vaccine > infection (no vaccine) > vaccine only > no infection/no vaccine.

Yeah. Barnes and Frei didn't read the contract at all. They were just going off the court filings. I don't think they were aware of the additional provision about AWS having the right to terminate right after the 30 day suspension notice provision.

What I find scary and disheartening is that people have to use throwaway accounts to even point this out.

Using a throwaway for anything political is just safer. I can comfortably talk about this with friends or colleagues, but I wouldn't broadcast it to the whole world with my name attached.

That is because he's giving a tiny example of a starter template for a console app.

If you were writing a "production-level" console app with multiple commands, logging, needed DI, input validation, nice looking progress bars, etc. Then this is pretty much what I'd want for a console template tbh.

Spectre.Console looks insanely nice.

None of those sound all that inflammatory. Mostly just political rhetoric.

"We’re going to walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women, and we’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them, because you’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have to be strong." -- In context, he is saying: "Cheer for the Republicans in congress, maybe not so much for the ones who aren't backing me because they aren't showing strength" -- nothing about that seems like it is incitement.

Yet somehow Democrats saying worse things is applauded. Compare that to where actual violence is implied: "If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. And you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere." - Maxine Waters "Go to the Hill today. Please, get up in the face of some congresspeople." - Cory Booker "We owe the American people to be there for them, for their financial security, respecting the dignity and worth of every person in our country, and if there is some collateral damage for some others who do not share our view, well, so be it, but it shouldn’t be our original purpose." - Nancy Pelosi

Some of my favorites are the little old lady carrying a little American flag, the people walking in a line between the roped off areas and the folks cleaning up after a couple of trash cans got overturned.

Seemed incredibly tame compared to the riots that went on over the summer that had massive amounts of looting and had buildings burnt to the ground.

I dunno. I think once you build a gallows, hang a noose on it, and start chanting about hanging someone as you push against barricaded doors where that person is sheltering, tame is no longer is quite the right word.

I think it is more that they see selectively removing content as equivalent to moderation and thus they shouldn't have safe harbor. So maybe they want them to only remove illegal content or something?