Isn't that what science is based upon though? We can only make assumptions based upon observed results. You can extrapolate and then test based upon those extrapolations, and we can acknowledge that there are gaps, but I don't think someone saying "wow, that didn't meet my expectations at all" in any way discredits science.
The author already provides a CDN url. If they are so inclined, creating a memorable url (perhaps even a shortlink) would help with styling quick and dirty projects. I don't think people are doing to be running massive websites using this library.
Business being the key term here - this kid is 13, and from what I can tell, doesn't make any money from this. How would it make sense for him to pay to have this available via CDN?
You could make a totally open-source, libre-licensed DRM enforcement framework -- any user willing to dig through it could probably modify and defuse it, but out of the box, it would be an example of free software which aims to defeat freedom.
> The other interpretation is that the experiment shows that collapse of potential fields into manifest reality is individual for each observer
General Relativity makes sense because our interpretation of a phenomenon is distorted in a mathematically reversible way which is localized to the observer.
If it were to be proven that a given wave function could collapse into two distinct quantum states simultaneously depending on the state of the observer, it would basically throw a wrench into the entire system.
some day mainstream scientism will realize that it is impossible to extrapolate global reality from local perceptions...