Why would it be their responsibility to succeed at topics in the fediverse more than it's your responsibility?

So which topics did you fail/refuse to crack down on the fediverse @Maken?

I personally failed to push harder for DIDs so switching servers without losing followers is easier.

That sounds like they want to subsidize the coal industry. AI is just the excuse.

Every time you update? How about Maps asking if you want to use advanced location every time you open it?

Maybe they are trying to make people use their API while they build an actual inference infrastructure behind?

The Arcade video, taking several seconds to load a few low resolution images, causes me pain.

That's why virtually every renderer stochastically discards indirect paths with low contribution. Looking at the source code, this one computes every subsequent bounce, even those hitting the perfectly blue sphere after hitting the perfectly green one.

The lack of rare earths could pretty much collapse the entire US' electronics industry.

Who has ever wanted that?

Why does a static blog need to store user information?

it's in the picture: personal advertising

[I know you were sarcastic, just wanted to make it clear for ...future generations]

arXiv was built over a good faith assumption, where a long paper meant at least the author had put some effort behind, and a every idea deserved attention. AI generated text breaks that assumption, and anybody uploading it is not acting in good faith.

And it's a unequal arms race, in which generating endless slop is way cheaper than storing it, because slop generators are subsidised (by operating at a loss) but arXiv has to pay the full price for their hosting.