Sounds like a great learning tool.

Not gonna fault people for learning, think the FUD is more so in the vein of being ignorant while working.

Yea, you dont really need to know how transistors work to code, but you didnt need that for 2 generations. Personally think (and hope), LLM code tools replace google and SO, more so than writing SW itself.

I got my start on a no-code visual editor. Hated it because the 5% of issues it couldn't handle took 80% of my time (with no way to actually do it in many cases). See LLM auto generation as the same, the problems that the tool dosent just solve will be your jobs, and you still need to know things for that.

Maybe journalists can return to "seeking truth" instead of generating clicks?

I mean, when the whole 2nd thing is completely automated because its bar is so low anything from 2 years ago could do it, that kinda only leaves the 1st option as a business idea.

> and as a result it'll make the internet worse for everyone.

Good, im on here too much already.

Dont think so?

Why its different:

Nobody cares who originally wrote the code as long as it works (ideally longer, rather than shorter). Software is intrinsically self-automating, so valuable skills are more along diagnosis and pattern recognition lines rather than specific skills themselves (yesteryears COBOL master could well be a JR engineer (or more likely management) at a startup). And also, people in charge of software companies have more on-hand people that may understand how AI works, and thus, not rely on such a system to the same extent (being generous to the c-suite here, we'll see shortly lol).

>blockchains

Youre right, that is idiotic. Ill offer $500m for it if we go by VC standards

Well, one this is for sure.

Its at least passed the turing test. Cool, scary but cool./