'Fallacy' ? Take two opposing Counterparts, teached by history. 'Farmers and the church were the first, who thought something like welfare, the farmer were "addicted" to the help of others to bring in the harvest, often village people to construct and harvest...historical the church seemed to be addicted to grace -which the people had to obey [turns-in-a-circle] to fulfill the will of "god" (abstract: a 3rd person). So it today those two (farmers and the church) seem to be the first who drag money out of it (the social).'
A few post above someone wrote something that "'fascist' refer to Germans who didn't join communism"
And that one may say, extremists are 'well-aligned on the idea of strict enforcement of their ideologies' (Quoting).
And add that Wilhelm II (Germany) was an grandchild of the british Queen Victoria. And, that socialdemocracy as domestic policy was concerned the biggest threat of his time (under his politics)
Bismarck (his predecessor) for example whereas is considered
as the father of the 'modern' welfare state.
Maybe a try to show how easy it was to distract me, with a simple 'governments pushing their agenda a lot more strongly than the general population would have on its own'. (-;
A few post above someone wrote something that "'fascist' refer to Germans who didn't join communism"
And that one may say, extremists are 'well-aligned on the idea of strict enforcement of their ideologies' (Quoting).
So take a look at history https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwardian_era
And add that Wilhelm II (Germany) was an grandchild of the british Queen Victoria. And, that socialdemocracy as domestic policy was concerned the biggest threat of his time (under his politics)
Bismarck (his predecessor) for example whereas is considered as the father of the 'modern' welfare state.
Maybe a try to show how easy it was to distract me, with a simple 'governments pushing their agenda a lot more strongly than the general population would have on its own'. (-;