yea enriching uranium to weapons grade in a secrete underground lair indicates no intention of developing a nuclear weapon.

Didn't companies inflate jobs availability to look more successful? And couldn't that now be an indication they arent smart enough to utilize AI?

Ruined Halloween for kids in the 80's. After this happened the streets were empty for the rest of my childhood. He should get the witch treatment if he's ever caught.

Turned into a newt?

This is pretty much the front page of reddit. click bait titles rise to the top and then thousands of people comment on it without even realize its either wrong or out of context

"If you agree with the despicable politics of the following political parties"

That's not limited to belonging to a political party, that seems to indicate agreeing with any of the politics. According to polls, the majority of americans agree with some republican policies, like reducing illegal immigration, and no boys in girl sports. Does that mean most american's cant use this?

> Buddhism is anti-violence.

Then Shaolin monks have some explaining to do

Typescript will eventually get the bad reputation of confusing types just like perl got the reputation of being line noise, then everybody will ridicule it and move on to something else.

> Just send the bullet points! Nobody wants the prose.

But the recipient can just ask AI to convert the prose into bullet points.

That’s what I can do with my new found time now that LLMs write my emails for me, use LLMs to converts others emails into bullet points!

Bonus global warming for everyone!

I believed in the conspiracies that covid came from a lab in china and something was seriously wrong with joe biden. Could it have helped me?

Stop trying to explain consciousness as something emergent from things. Its easier to explain it the other way around.

Has there been found a way to properly explain consciousness at all?

You frame it as if there's a wrong way and a correct way. We're still watching the effects of the colors of the oil paint smeared on our hands while we just have an idea of the painting, but we don't even know if using a brush would be better than using a painting knife.

If you explain it the other way around, you'll also face some serious issues. Do we live in a shared reality, independent of us, which allows us to "come in" and interact with other beings, with pre-set rules of how this reality shares ours and other's interactions among all of us, or is this an all-encompassing reality which is the result of the imagination of a single being, possibly even one seeing itself through multiple simultaneous interaction points we call conscient beings in this place we call reality, which this thing has invented all by itself, from the ant walking over a grain of sand to you reading this message on a screen, a screen "we" first had to invent? If not even that is clear, how can anything be easy about any of this?

Could you elaborate? Things emerge from consciousness? I don't follow.

How do you know that there's something instead of nothing?

_René has entered the chat_

This is new to you? Its only the foundation of two major world religions.

Ah, I see. I sort of hoped it wasn't that.