Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | IntemerateApe's comments login

it seems like if you tell people we only have X years left, then they will be more than happy to sit on their ass for X-1 years


And then at X+1 years claim "Well, I guess it's too late to do anything now".


This was me doing my homework in the 1990's.


It's human nature to do this, why would you do something earlier than required if it takes effort? We only have a certain amount of energy / attention at our disposal.


It is very ironic that Amazon asks Ring owners to respect privacy!


This is awesome. Thanks for sharing!


No! People must be sincere and serious at all times.


Isn't this obvious?

"tests show human drivers can be fooled too"


If a government (any) could build and operate these type of aircraft - what would be their purpose?

That is what I cant figure out.


The conspiracy theory idea I've heard is that at some point there is an intention to fake an "alien attack" in order to extend governmental power, etc.


it would have to be a democratic country with these types of capabilities. US, is the obvious choice


Sun blockers? Mr burns style, but to fight global warming - giant kites that reflect light upwards and absorb from below?


Perhaps one nation whose navy is being harassed by UFOs is demonstrating that they, too, can play that game.


perhaps they want to go down in history, or they are so bitter and resentful they want to take others down. Like kids who do school shootings..

Not sure though.


> perhaps they want to go down in history

Many people have done things like that in history (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herostratus), but that's also hard to reconcile with disguising one's role and responsibility and preventing proof of either from being established, isn't it?


I would like to learn more of this, but this article lacked a lot of substance.


It's like voldemort - if you say the name, you get banned.

saying a fairly-public person's name is not the same thing as harassing or doxxing


No, but an awful lot of that "saying" was in the context of pretty clear harrassment. Two things can be true at the same time:

1. Reddit went way too far trying to protect their employee from harassment.

2. Reddit's employee was being actively harrassed on Reddit.

The second is worse, sorry.


> Reddit's employee was being actively harrassed on Reddit.

Can you show the harassment versus comment about the situation?


It shouldn’t be considered harassing or “doxxing”, but this precedent of arbitrary labeling was set on numerous occasions. For example it was set by activists and partisans crying “doxxing” on past occasions like when journalist Andy Ngo documented the criminal activity of antifa groups in Portland or when Zero Hedge listed the public information of the Wuhan lab’s head straight from the lab’s public facing website.

Randomly made up, highly charged words like “doxxing” have no place in our discourse. We need to have fixed language if we are to reason about the world around us in a consistent and useful manner. Unfortunately these days language has itself become a political tool and battleground.


Slang happens. By planting your flag you're relegating yourself to history. Yes, these matters deserve more nuance. Yes, many of the people speaking authoritatively are in fact missing important details or fudging the facts to fit their bias. Unfortunately, that's just the state of things. I don't have a better solution cooked up, but trying to cancel is a word is just plain laughable. (Obvious exceptions are obvious)


The helicopter is the thing I am MOST excited about!


Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: