Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ALurchyBeast's commentslogin

IBM tries to capture the 1% of the market that accounts for 99% of the revenue. You or I spinning up a micro instance is not who IBM wants.


Did Harmony ruin it, or did Logitech ruin Harmony?


It was a logitech device when I had the couple I did


Before jumping at Google/Fitbit train, take a look at Withings watches. Their Healthmate app is solid. In my experience much better than Fitbit, and it isnt trying to sell me on any premium services.

I have a Steel HR & the battery life is measured in weeks.


If I end up not buying a new Apple Watch, I will look into it! My Fitbit broke recently and I'm on the market.

The EKG is ... really tempting, though - that's about the only thing that's pulling me toward the Apple Watch.


I’m curious, why is the EKG feature that tempting? I don’t really see what I’d do with it besides doing a reading once in a while


I have OCD and one of its manifestations is hypochondria and fear of any arbitrary chest pain. It'd be nice to have some software that could assuage the random fears so every little tinge in my chest didn't send me running to an Urgent Care.


Musk said "Tesla stock price is too high imo". This was a clue that the 1:5 stock split was coming.

Where did he ever say Tesla was overvalued?


Here is the 'fat lines' patent you mentioned: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6930686. It's more about efficiency of drawing a line than connecting four dots.


What the patent says it's about and what your lawyers say it's about are two different things


That's not true. If a patent doesn't say what it's about in a fairly prescribed way, it is easily defeated.


So whats your solution? Never put a bunch of satellites in space?


He's not necessarily saying he know's a solution, just that such a problem should be considered. Satellites do collide - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_satellite_collision

The idea of satellite collisions and space junk is an actual concern https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_syndrome .

Sure a few washing machines in space isn't a big concern. Now imagine a few collide, hundreds of bits and bolts flying around earth, at unknown trajetories, at thousands of miles per hour.


There are a variety of potential mitigations. Legal requirements that satellites deorbit or park in a safe orbit before going dark, technology like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E.Deorbit to capture and deorbit large chunks, better tracking of orbital debris, etc.


IBM bought SoftLayer 5 years ago, and was unable to capitalize on their niche (bare metal). Instead they decided to double down on provisioning VMs, which SoftLayer was never that great at. The set of features IBM's VM's provides compared to any other modern cloud is terrible (headed backwards in Gartner charts). It's barely getting any better, meanwhile Google/AWS/Azure are gobbing on features.

IBM effectively failed in their integration of SoftLayer. They bought SoftLayer but failed to modernize them. Why will RedHat be any different?

Take a look at what's left of SoftLayer today. Most folks who had the necessary skills to keep their ancient php platform relevant have left a long time ago.

I'm sure IBM is on their 5th iteration of their "next gen" VM provisioning system by now, due out any quarter...


Have they fixed their scheduler? For 5 years nothing has improved in the process of launching VMs. Sometimes it just barfs and goes to hell, requiring contacting support to terminate provisioning.

No joke, at one of the previous places we’ve implemented a task which would raise a support ticket via API if provisioning step was hanging for longer than x minutes. This is the case for years!

According to some people from IBM, the reason why IBM purchased SoftLayer was so they could tell their customers who were looking to move to the cloud „you want cloud, we have cloud” ... and keep the hefty support contract runing.


More fatally than that, perhaps: IBM's business model for half-a-century at least including renting time on hardware at as close to commodity costs as IBM could push them (and still make a very healthy profit admittedly). The Cloud model was IBM's invention in a time where computers were expensive. IBM's failure to transition that very business model the company was built upon to a time where computers are plentiful, is like watching an Olympic swimmer forget how to swim in a lake.


SoftLayer is not competitive. It was undercut by Google Cloud since last year, while AWS is not that far off.

Once everyone offers a choice of 1 TB Virtual Machines for rent, SOftLayer will be completely out of the equation. They're strictly worse in services and pricing.

https://thehftguy.com/2018/01/15/the-inevitable-demise-of-ib...


I wonder if this is Zuckerberg's way of saying "fuck you" to Winklevoss twins/Gemini.


By giving them even more money?


I don't understand your comment ? They own Gemeni exchange not Coinbase. Do they have stakes in Coinbase ?


They have BTC, this would increase the value of BTC dramatically.


I see the increase in policies and procedures as a big issue at larger companies. Take your standard CRUD app created at some large corporation. It will go through QA, security auditing, legal, and whatever other team has established a policy or procedure around some process. Each one of these elements takes some number of weeks or months, and each different silo is typically unapproachable (or has some procedure on how to approach them, too).

Smaller companies can achieve higher velocity because the employees dont necessarily need the policies and procedures, or they simply havent been created yet.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: