Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | 2_listerine_pls's commentslogin

I believe it's a documented fact that breakthrough technologies involve breakthroughs.


Very pithy comment. Breakthroughs are only breakthroughs in hindsight. False positives and negatives abound in breakthrough declarations.


What about city activity with pollution?

more activity -> more pollution -> more crime

more activity -> more crime


Just saw a TechCrunch article with a title saying Richard was defending Epstein.

edit: what's up with the downvotes


Exactly - this why 'media' is being called out here.


He didn't suggest underage sex was OK.

His crime was being pedantic about the definition of rape around people who can't even differentiate rape from underage sex, which are probably the same people that are interpreting it as Him defending underage sex.


Yes he did: "I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children." *

Stallman was driven out because of decades of abusive behavior and opinions. The most recent incident was just the final straw. Ignoring that historical context is rather disingenuous.

* https://www.stallman.org/archives/2006-may-aug.html#05%20Jun...


His comment begins with "I am skeptical".

Do we consider skepticism to be abusive now?

Anyway, he subsquently said that he changed his mind on that point, after discussions with other people about it. You ought to include that if you're going to try to represent the man's history.


In case you haven't noticed, we are talking about what He said in the recent emails, not in 2006.


We're discussing his resignation and the pressure that was surely brought to bear on him to do so. Which almost certainly is related to his history of pro-pedophilia comments, not just the most recent ones.


But at the same time the other side is arguing that the tactics used to this end involve misquoting and lying about what he said.

In the end it is two groups of people having two correlated (but different) conversations.

Many (not all, but many) of RMS "defenders" here would completely agree if not for this backhanded tactics, as some are only asking for proper representation of facts.

The fact that a lot of "takedown" pieces continue to lie means that they force together two groups of people that do not necessarily agree.


She was a child. And trafficked.

Minsky committed rape.


If sex without consent is rape, and minors can't meaningfully consent to having sex with an adult, then having sex with a minor is kinda rape.

His comment about 17 vs. 18 years old shows that he's detached from reality. The law has to draw the line somewhere, it's necessarily arbitrary to some extent. It's still okay to discuss such nuances, but then don't be snarky. Context matters too. What point was he trying to make here and why?


You are twisting what Stallman said.

-He argued that rape is no the same as having sex with a minor. He is right, that's not the definition of rape.

-A minor is not necessarily a child. You can be a minor and the next day be 18 in a porno movie.

-Never did Stallman said it was ok, He just raised the question whether Minsky knew She was being coerced by Epstein. Clearly not the same.


I hear this argument exclusively from adults.


Have you actually tried talking to a lot of children about this topic?

(it would be funny if you did; it would also be equally funny if you didn't, and are surprised that children didn't express said argument, even though you didn't give them the chance)


Because it is not the definition of rape.


Does YC have hardware partnerships?


Does YC have Hardware accelerator partnerships?


Search for MIT's solar sponge.


You are generalizing. I am doing a MicroMaster in data science from MITx and they grant the equivalent credits of the first semester. It's worth something if I ever apply to a similar master program.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: