Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | 2009-01-28login
Stories from January 28, 2009
Go back a day, month, or year. Go forward a day, month, or year.
Freedom
153 points | parent
2.Gmail goes offline with Google Gears (gmailblog.blogspot.com)
110 points by wastedbrains on Jan 28, 2009 | 50 comments
3.Current YC founder looking for co-founder
on Jan 28, 2009
4.If You Can't Say Anything Nice, Kill Yourself (guardian.co.uk)
93 points by riklomas on Jan 28, 2009 | 156 comments
Money
91 points | parent
6.A little secret that will make the world fall apart (alumnit.ca)
89 points by soundsop on Jan 28, 2009 | 113 comments
7.How we reduced chargebacks by 30% (as a percentage of sales) (37signals.com)
80 points by brm on Jan 28, 2009 | 23 comments
8.Google Apps Botches Domain Renewals, Websites Go Dark (joelonsoftware.com)
72 points by patio11 on Jan 28, 2009 | 19 comments
9.The Ultimate Dogfooding Story (codinghorror.com)
70 points by bdotdub on Jan 28, 2009 | 34 comments
10.Cal to offer course in Advanced Starcraft Theory (crunchgear.com)
69 points by rockstar9 on Jan 28, 2009 | 29 comments

I know Arrington, and he's much nicer than you sound. Can you give an example where he's said anything even half as nasty about anyone as you've just said about him?

From the way you describe your beef with him, it sounds as if you're making up a personality for him-- that you're projecting onto him your bitterness about "Web 2.0 greed culture." You're wrong about that too, incidentally.

12.Tracking an entire Windows sytem inside Git (alumnit.ca)
62 points by swapspace on Jan 28, 2009 | 21 comments

Why do you have so much animosity toward him? You say he represents everything you hate about Web 2.0 greed culture, but is that a valid reason to delight in someone receiving a nice cream pie in the face?

I think you need to stop and reconsider whether this is the appropriate attitude to take toward someone who really does nothing more than write articles and speak at conferences.

I'd also argue that a culture of tolerance, civility and diversity of views does far more to foster the open exchange of ideas than the silencing of those with whom we disagree.

I do agree somewhat with some of the criticisms that you and others have put forth about Techcrunch as a publication, in particular that it was prone to hype. But otherwise I think he performed a valuable service to our industry, and I think his willingness to speak his mind is both rare and laudable.

It saddens me that the animosity and intolerance that have shadowed Techcrunch have boiled over to something as despicable as this.


You think that spitting on someone should be illegal!?

Yes, spitting on someone is illegal.

Fun game: stand on a busy street corner and spit on everyone who walks by. If you're arrested before you're crippled, you win.

15.Ask YC: Meditation Advice
59 points by andr on Jan 28, 2009 | 78 comments

This is terrible, worse than people speculating about Steve Jobs' health, as an example of how low folks in our industry can go. (I know they're unrelated but the 2 evoke the same emotions in me.)

I desperately want Michael Arrington to cover my startup as well, but I still can't understand those that threatened or spat on him. Michael, I hope you return to regular writing after Feb, but if you don't, thanks for all the great work so far.

17.Working from Home: Why It Rocks (artisansystem.com)
57 points by leftnode on Jan 28, 2009 | 10 comments
18.Linked from Penny Arcade - PA Day 2009 (aisleten.com)
57 points by MicahWedemeyer on Jan 28, 2009 | 6 comments
19.Taming Doubt (defmacro.org)
52 points by apgwoz on Jan 28, 2009 | 10 comments

I agree, it's a sad state of affairs, but

"I desperately want Michael Arrington to cover my startup as well"

I don't really get this... startups don't fall or succeed based on tc coverage. It might spike traffic for a day with some geeks. That's all at the end of the day.

Seems like some of this is TC's own doing - they have made people believe you have to get techcrunched, or you won't succeed - which is completely false.

I think they do a great job in the main though.


I see nothing at all morally wrong with speculating over Steve's health (though it's often not very useful). Remember that every AAPL owner is a part owner of the company. It's not at all untoward for an investor in the company to want to know what health the CEO is in, especially one thought to be as influential as him, and Jobs has been opaque about it since the beginning. A lot of people have, collectively, over $80b tied up in the company, and they have no idea if the guy running it will live another year or two.

When your company goes public, a decision Steve himself made long ago, you know that from then on, what you disclose to owners of the company you effectively disclose to everyone. He knew what he was getting.

Speculating as to his health doesn't worsen it or harm him in any way. If anything is immoral, it's Steve's purposely hiding it and even, this year, lying about it.

22.What real life bad habits has programming given you? (stackoverflow.com)
45 points by danw on Jan 28, 2009 | 87 comments

Two stick out:

1. Answering questions fairly literally.

a. "Did you like the salad?" "No, I did not."

b. "Would you like to go to the fine art museum with me and 4 of my friends on Friday night?" "No, I would not like that."

c. Note that I can escape from this pattern only when it's extremely obvious the truthful answer is a bad one.

"Do these jeans make my ass look fat?" "I don't think it's the jeans..." I can avoid those at least...

2. Intentionally filtering out mundane trivia from my brain. "Do you know so-and-so's phone number?" "No, but it's in my phone." "When you left this morning, did you notice if my black gloves were on the counter?" "I would never notice them unless they were on fire or something..."

24.Microsoft Ships Python Code... in 1996 (python-history.blogspot.com)
44 points by mace on Jan 28, 2009 | 5 comments

Constantly wondering if people mean `or' or `xor' (I mean xor)

Poor sleep habits.

As others have said, never ever ever use google as your domain registrar. In general, you usually don't want to buy a domain name "bundled" with other services such as google apps or hosting. (Note: Dreamhost is a terrible host, but a decent registrar.)

Always always keep control over your DNS. If this guy was hosting with Slicehost or Linode, he would've had the option to point the MMX records anywhere he liked, and problem solved (or at least, temporarily contained.)

Lastly, I can say from personal experience that Google's support is shockingly bad. It is a deep and twisted warren of blind alleys, misinformation, and a million different paths that all end in "fuck you". You will not contact a human. There are no humans. Thousands of genius engineers engineered teh googelz to be perfect and human free for your utopian pleasure, and then they spent all day riding around on bikes and playing ping pong and eating free food and getting massages and inventing world-changing things. They're better than you. Google doesn't have problems. Ever. You must have done something wrong.

Please wait 5 days, and try again. If you continue getting this error, please contact support. Sorry, support is only available to Premium customers. Would you like to purchase Premium service? To purchase Premium service, simply log into your domain. Sorry, that domain is no longer active; if you have recently changed that domain, please wait 5 days, and try again. Contact support if you have any questions.

Their approach to customer service is to send their customers in circles until they give up. It's evil. Very extremely cruel and evil.

I use google apps for two of my domains. What can I say, their software is very well designed, and on the net balance, it's easier to manage than postfix. But the lack of support is a major down side, certainly. I wouldn't even consider paying a dime for any of their services without seeing some huge changes in their approach.


Meditation isn't a silver bullet. If you're not sleeping enough, you should do that first. If you're not exercising enough, do that second.

if you want users, techcrunch is not much help. if you want adventurous corporate clients or investor awareness, it's top notch.

Spitting in his face is going a bit far, but it's pretty difficult for me to feel sympathy for the guy. I struggle to think of a more dislikable, arrogant jerk. This belated plea for human-to-human sympathy falls on deaf ears, for me at least.

In my group, Arrington symbolises everything we hate about the "Web 2.0" greed culture. He's relentlessly promoted himself as the gatekeeper to this bullshit world of easy VC money, now crashing down around him. Good riddance.

If it hadn't been something as revolting as spitting, and instead say a nice cream pie to the face, I'd be delighted.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: