Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | megiddo's comments login

How else would you do lights out eye tracking for heatmap evaluation??

Not one photo of said frog.

Look, new rule: you write an article about frogs, you include a photo.



this was really helpful! thanks!


But the article explains perfectly how they look like. White eyes, glucose filled cells, frozen solid as a rock. Bang it against a table, it's definitely frozen. Throw it back underneath those leaves.


Like the Tree Octopus?


I mean, maybe technically.

But the "its yearly with a cancellation fee" was not qualified in the sales information on the sign-up page. Maybe it was in the fine print.

Given that customers are quite used to a monthly fee is a monthly subscription model, it was disingenuous at best. Putting significant terms in the fine print doesn't exactly engender trust.


https://imgur.com/a/ldhiEtf

There is no fine print. It is extremely clear and obvious. If you see a term called "Annual paid monthly", 33% less expensive than a monthly option right above, what possible other interpretation can someone have?


I'm glad you're bringing screenshots to the conversation because so often people just talk about what they feel without grounding it in anything.

What the screenshot makes clear is that you'd have to be a single-celled organism to not understand what you're signing up for...

The screen is extremely clear, upfront and even the supposed "fine print" is in huge font with any easy link to learn more.


This is not how it was presented when I signed up, 8 years ago. I am aware of the differences between monthly and yearly subscriptions with discounts.


8 years is a long time in life and in business.


I think they clarified it more recently, because the FTC is taking a separate action against them on this specific issue. I doubt there would have been much of an issue if it had been that clear in the first place.

https://natlawreview.com/article/ftc-targets-adobe-hidden-fe...


A few years ago it still had the three options (monthly, annual billed monthly and annual prepaid) but didn't -- at least on the first page, though it did when you confirmed your transaction -- have the specific notice about an early termination fee. It still seemed like something where any rational person would ask themselves "what sort of idiot would pay 33% more for `monthly' when there's this no downside annual paid monthly thing? Got em!", but I guess there was some argument for being bamboozled.

But it is the way it is now for at least three+ years. People are still thinking they're beating the system.

Does it try to ensnare users trying to save some money now? Sure, it does. It offers some revenue planning for Adobe in return for a discount. The FTC is basically arguing that there shouldn't be such a discount.


In either case, my grounds for cancelling early really had nothing to do with the year-long case.

My grounds for cancelling is that the software didn't work. And I don't mean in some qualitative sense. The software would just crash when opening files or creating new files.

Adobe never held up their end of the bargain - providing functioning software.

https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fexternal-prev...


This was ~8 years ago. I am fairly careful when signing up for services and subscriptions, having learned hard lessons when signing up for gym memberships in the 1900s.


Let me regale you with the story of my Adobe Subscription cancellation.

I had been considering learning Illustrator and to align myself, I decided to get a little skin the game. I signed up for the "monthly" subscription. I downloaded Illustrator, and this screenshot was my entire experience:

https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fexternal-prev...

Suffice it to say, this didn't meet my expectations. I thus decided to cancel and was presented with a $108 cancellation fee.

Boo.

I hit up customer service and explained my frustration. I was told that I was going to pay that $108 since I agreed to it. I countered that contracts required consideration and since Adobe had provided no consideration for my valuable cash, no contract had been perfected betwixt us. He was unwilling to see my point. I asked for his contact information for follow-up, which he provided. I then explained to him that after I hung up, I was not only NOT going to pay, but that within 60 days Adobe would cancel the subscription voluntarily on their side and not collect a single further dime from me.

His response basically amounted to "good luck with that."

So, I got a temporary prepaid credit card number with $5 on it and swapped out the CC on file with Adobe.

I then went over to Amazon and spent that $5. Who knows on what.

A month goes by, turns out $0 is insufficient for a monthly subscription payment. I get a notice that the balance isn't good. I get several more notices.

Then I get a notice that if I don't pay, I'll lose access. At about 60 days, they cancelled the subscription. I took a screen shot and emailed it to the CSR's contact with my "I told you so" scrawled on it.

I never heard back, but in my mind it was a great victory. Tickertape and swooning ladies.


IIRC the trick with Adobe is to cancel on the web site, and when it says "but, but, how about this great upgrade?" you say yes, and then you can cancel your 'new' plan during its introductory period.

Maybe they closed that loophole, but it did used to work not that long ago.


Great story, but you should be careful with this method if you care about your credit. They are arguably within their rights to report this to the credit agencies as an unpaid debt and send it to collections, including the cancellation fee since they can point to the clickwrap contract that states it.


Great Story!

I think you could also dispute the charges via your credit card company. The credit card company should reverse the charges.


I thought he was just going to say he did a chargeback, with how the first seven paragraphs went. What he described was not ideal for several reasons:

- Some websites won't accept prepaid cards (largely because they can be used to get around things like this).

- Who knows if a platform's going to save your previous card info to use as a fallback?

- As another reply stated, the company can send you to collections if they think you owe them money. They can also do that if you do a chargeback, theoretically. However, with a chargeback, your card company did some basic checking of the situation and agreed with you that something was wrong about the payment, so assuming you win the chargeback, you've at least had a second pair of eyes on the case, and you have that tiny bit of metaphorical "precedent" to use if you take the collections order to court-- both of which also mean they're less likely to take you to collections. If you just swap out your card number for one that doesn't work, that shifts some of the shadiness to your end, and it legally appears less like you have any grounds to stand on.


If I recall, the problem was that they were refusing to cancel the subscription unless I paid the cancellation fee.

My argument was that while I may have agreed to the cancellation fee in the fine print, they contract was not perfected because they never provided consideration.

The software would not work on my computer.

My grounds for cancelling the software wasn't that I wanted to cancel early, I was satisfied with a year-long subscription. My grounds for cancelling was that the software simply didn't work. It crashed when opening AI files are creating new files.


This is a great story, but I'd like to also point out that it shows why the popular trend of only blaming a company's top management for that company's terrible behavior is wrong: many people have a tendency to want to sympathize with the lowest-level workers at a company, saying "they're only doing their jobs and have no say in business decisions" when interacting with customer service personnel. As you can see here, many (if not the vast majority) of these low-ranking foot soldiers are sociopathic assholes who really believe the corporate BS and are happy to do their utmost to screw over customers. It's not just the higher-up managers or CxOs, though they usually set the direction.


I think my favorite part of this is watching LLM-bros awkwardly rediscover basic AI concepts that have been studied in depth for 5 decades.


Can we stop with "bros"? It's honestly such low quality nonsense. If you have something to say it shouldn't need ad hominem to support it.


This just smells like Lamarckism with more steps.


Stunning that Vance isn't mentioned.

I can't imagine how he's overlooked in this article.


Likewise. I feel that Jack Vance's Dying Earth series isn't as well known as it should be considering the huge influence it had on the invention of D&D (there's names of spells copied directly from it).


Damn, I've been trying to sell mine.

Is there a used market place for them?


I think there is a place called 'electronic Bay'. You might try there.

Yes, that was a Ron Swanson reference.


There might be some variant of a r/hardwareswap.

Side note, if you/anyone in the Netherlands is trying to sell one I'm interested.


Drop me an email(on my profile) I'd be interested possibly.


Sold mine for $300 on ebay.


That's nuts considering they're available for $170, unless it was one of the sold out transparent ones.


Well, it was soon after they really got their shipping rhythm going.

I got mine in the mail, it sat on my desk for a few weeks because I was busy with other stuff, and it made me sad to just have it sit there unused. I wasn't completely sold on getting rid of it, so I put it on ebay for what I assumed to be an outrageous price, and it was gone within an hour. I shoulda bought 2!


Wait until you hear about the demo scene!


You could hash the hoard and stick the signature on a blockchain.

If only it was 2018, we could do this as a startup and make a mint.


We'll fight one buzzword with another!


There are companies that do this! It’s for proving that something existed at a particular moment back in time.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: