Much of the DSM is toxic legacy from the dark ages of psychiatry -- an era that we've yet to transcend.

Meanwhile, your conclusion doesn't seem to fit with the text of the article you linked.

You say:

    > Asperger's syndrome will be removed from DSM-5 next month.
    > So next month, the person won't have the syndrome anymore...
    > The syndrome won't even exist anymore...

From the article:

    > DSM-V, will come out in May and Asperger’s will be 
    > notably absent, replaced with the broader definition 
    > of “autism spectrum disorder.” Previously, Asperger’s
    > was thought to be a milder form of autism.

My interpretation is that it's still the generic spectrum disorder that we never really understood, but now the DSM reflects this reality better than it did previously.

Of course, I concede to the prevailing stance of people more experienced in and affected by this decision.

Currently there are several disorders inside the spectrum for high functioning autism (PDD-NOS, Asperger, High functioning classic autism) and the line between them most of the time is very thin, on the other hand therapies for treatment are the same, so DSM just took the obvious decision of put them together in one big umbrella.

It'll just be rolled into the general 'autism spectrum' definition.