Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think there's a difference between people getting a system a d realising it isn't actually what they wanted and "never survive collision with reality".

They survive by being modified and I don't think that invalidates the process that got them in front of people faster than would otherwise have been possible.

This isn't a defence of waterfall though. It's really about increasing the pace of agile and the size of the loop that is possible.



I think I agree with what you’re saying? But that’s not the waterfall approach GP pitched.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: