Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

everyone complains, nobody has alternatives.

what would have been the correct actions in that situation?

really the government should tax in good times.

and

spend in bad times.

and be a counter weight to private sector



The government acted as if the pandemic was happening in 1990, when everyone either worked in person all the time, or nothing worked.

Instead, the golden geese of the American economy (the actual golden geese), simply stayed home and worked from their laptop.

This created a situation where people were getting their regular paycheck, plus getting a multitude of stimulus on top of that. There were many making $100k+ salary, not paying rent (rent moratorium), not paying student loans (student loan moratorium), and not going out to do anything, resulting in having huge pools of cash laying around. If you had a mortgage, you got to refi at 3% and dramatically cut your mortgage bill. I won't even get into PPP loans either, everyone knows the story there.

I could write pages and pages about this, but the short of it is, we thought we need a wheelbarrow of money, but technology meant we only needed a jug of money. But we still got the full wheelbarrow.


no they literally just kept printing money for no reason


Its the 'kept printing' that is the problem with the story.

There was a surge and a pull back.

Post-COVID Tightening: After this historic surge, the Federal Reserve began "quantitative tightening" in 2022 to combat inflation, slowing M2 growth to near zero and eventually reversing it.


This was arguably largely offset by the actions of the treasury's increased short duration issuance (>1 Trillion in t-bills) combined with draw-downs of the reverse repo facility[1] instead of from banks. It's difficult to tell exactly how much money winds it's way into the economy without using proxies - for example credit spreads[2] or NFCI[3] which indicate loose conditions, which don't show much evidence of post 2022 QT's impact.

Or in other words the data seems to show the loosening effects were more powerful than the tightening ones. Now that the RRP has been drawn down balance sheet growth will likely occur.

[1] https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/RRPONTSYD

[2] https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/BAMLH0A0HYM2

[3]https://www.chicagofed.org/research/data/nfci/current-data


>slowing M2 growth to near zero and eventually reversing it.

The M2 money supply went from 15.4b at the start of 2020 to a peak of 21.7b, before slightly reversing to 20.7b. Then they just continued printing. Now it currently stands at a record high of 22.2b. The dollar is more diluted than ever.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M2SL


its a tight rope. shrinking the money supply also has downsides.

Summary of the Policy Reversal Period Policy Action Balance Sheet Impact

June 2022 – Nov 2025 QT (Tightening) Shrank from ~$9T to ~$6.5T

Dec 1, 2025 QT Ends Runoff stops; maturing assets reinvested

Dec 12, 2025 – 2026 Reserve Management Expansion begins via T-bill purchases

By December 1, 2025, the Fed officially halted QT after reducing its balance sheet by approximately $2.4 trillion. The following factors forced the reversal to expansion: 1. Liquidity Squeeze and Repo Market Stress As the Fed drained cash from the system, bank reserves fell toward "critical thresholds". This caused stress in the overnight repo market, where banks lend to each other. Spiking Rates: Key short-term lending rates, such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), spiked above the Fed’s target range, indicating cash was becoming scarce.


And directly funneling it to the rich




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: