Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

"It was just to keep people from installing something other than Windows" seems very counter-indicated by it taking ~7 years for a Windows UEFI bootkit to come out, and 13 years for one for Linux.

...and this bootkit is not able to work if Secure Boot is set up.

UEFI is also a godsend in terms of fixing a lot of the legacy BIOS crap






> UEFI is also a godsend in terms of fixing a lot of the legacy BIOS crap

In my experience there's a lot more crap in UEFI than there ever was in BIOS, if only because there's so much more of it.


> and this bootkit is not able to work if Secure Boot is set up.

wrong.

> UEFI is also a godsend in terms of fixing a lot of the legacy BIOS crap

that's like saying cutting the baby in half to end the dispute also solved the crying


> UEFI is also a godsend in terms of fixing a lot of the legacy BIOS crap

From a user perspective, no, it is not. Booting is far more complicated with UEFI.


What do you mean? The boot menu now works with the mouse and I can click on the operating system I want to run.

And my bloody computer is potentially trying to make god-blessed network calls before the OS has even loaded, and before my machine even provides the bare minimum human interface, you want me to navigate cryptography?

The trusted computing initiative was a disaster to the learnability of the computing field.

Devs are users too. Especially the unskilled/ignorant ones.


I thought you said UEFI.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: