The next six publishers are going to be looking for $100B and probably have the funds for better lawyers.
At some point these are going to hit the courts, an NY Times probably makes sense as the plaintiff as opposed to one of the larger publishing houses.
The Times has a lauder litigation team. Their finances are good and their revenue sources diverse. They’re not aching to strike a deal.
> NY Times probably makes sense as the plaintiff as opposed to one of the larger publishing houses
Why? Especially if this goes to a jury.
The next six publishers are going to be looking for $100B and probably have the funds for better lawyers.
At some point these are going to hit the courts, an NY Times probably makes sense as the plaintiff as opposed to one of the larger publishing houses.