Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I would too. I would pay maybe $100+ a year for this, even for only 4GB or whatever I currently have on Dropbox. But maybe this still wouldn't be profitable to develop if only a small group of paranoid users would buy it.



10$ a month is not a lot of money. But, why not just use Dropbox on locally encrypted files?


Because then the web interface is worthless and you have to decrypt the files on every machine you sync with Dropbox


Check SpiderOak - sounds like exactly what you want. https://spideroak.com/




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: