If you produce software within the framework of the free software movement then you are sharing it. What free software licence allows you not to share your source?
The word communism can also describe systems that are mutual with consent, and most of the states that claim to be communist appear to be run by totalitarians who use the word and associated dogma to seize and hold power under the promise of equity in the future, so I am not sure there has ever been an actual communist state, by the terms of the philosophy.
Personally, I'm a Groucho Marxist, so my main tenet is that I wouldn't want to join a club that would have someone like me as a member. ;)
no no, i will not enter this discussion, because time flies like an arrow and fruit flies like a banana;)
(btw. you can always take a FS, modify it and keep it completly to yourself, so all FS licenses allow you not to share)
Yep, but then you would from then not be participating in the free software movement for that particular project. If you then later shared your modifications you would be again.
Look, a four year old child could understand this. Quick, someone fetch me a four year old child. I can't make head nor tail of any of it.
[edit] I wonder how it would go if I tried to work Groucho Marx quotes into all of my posts. Something tells me it might not go too well.
The word communism can also describe systems that are mutual with consent, and most of the states that claim to be communist appear to be run by totalitarians who use the word and associated dogma to seize and hold power under the promise of equity in the future, so I am not sure there has ever been an actual communist state, by the terms of the philosophy.
Personally, I'm a Groucho Marxist, so my main tenet is that I wouldn't want to join a club that would have someone like me as a member. ;)