Your point seems muddled. If the majority of costs come from the last 18 months of care why does it matter if those last months occur at age 50 with heart disease or 70 with cancer? 18 months is 18 months.
Your point seems to rather be that some diseases are cheaper to treat than others, or that the total area under the cost-life curve is driving the cost, not just the last few months.
Your point seems to rather be that some diseases are cheaper to treat than others, or that the total area under the cost-life curve is driving the cost, not just the last few months.