No, mate - it wouldn't. Don't be confused by the "printf"-dump; the Python script processed it into pairs of (frequency,delay). That is, when you see...
989 Hz @ 15209 989 Hz @ 15213 989 Hz @ 15218 784 Hz @ 15222 784 Hz @ 15226
(989, 15222-15209), (784, ... -15222),
I wouldn't have gone to Huffman compression if I had a simpler choice.
No, mate - it wouldn't. Don't be confused by the "printf"-dump; the Python script processed it into pairs of (frequency,delay). That is, when you see...
...the data actually generated are: Simply put: RLE can't do anything on them. The repetition has already been "cleaned out".I wouldn't have gone to Huffman compression if I had a simpler choice.