Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Treating bitcoin as a currency is kind of wrong. It's a commodity with limited and predictable supply, like gold for example. You wouldn't call it a pyramid scheme, just like you wouldn't the gold market a pyramid scheme. His points against its use as currency are sound.



It's a commodity designed to only be useful as a unit of trade. How does this differ from a fiat currency?


By definition fiat currency relies on governent regulation (and an internet protocol cannot be considered representative government, unless you create a committee to oversee the protocol, in which case we're back where we started).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: