Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Why not you? Just don't use CF. The more people stay away from CF, the better.



I feel like for a lot of sites CF & CDNs are the only way to survive Reddit/HN/etc - do you disagree?

I definitely agree in concept with you, but then i think back to how frequently script kiddies took down sites ~10 years ago, or w/e. I feel like what has changes is the massive CDNs in front of so many sites.

So while i do want a better solution, i'm not sure what it looks like. Thoughts?


Does it really matter? If you're small, who cares if you go down for half an hour? What, you'll make $0.02 this hour instead of $0.05? If you're big, you can afford your own infrastructure. Stick a few servers in a few colos around the world and you'll have better uptime than CF and friends anyway.


You're talking thousands of dollars for colo servers vs. free for CF


> I feel like for a lot of sites CF & CDNs are the only way to survive Reddit/HN/etc - do you disagree?

Reddit/HN/etc will send all users to the same URL. Almost all of those users will come without any pre-existing cookies. Serving the same content to all those users should not be impossible for most sites without CF or a CDN.


Some kind of decentralized CDN in theory.


CDNs are decentralized by nature.


Peer-to-peer, something like a blockchain where no entity controls all the nodes.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: