Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Thank you for coming on. This quote caught my attention:

>The fact that more of the girls appear to have decreased in autism severity may be due to an increasing number of girls who have learned how to mask their symptoms.

What hypothesis exist to explain this gender disparity?



The gender disparity in autism prevalence is one of the big mysteries of autism since genes associated with autism risk are not generally located on the XY sex chromosome. There are a number of hypotheses out there for the disparity of prevalence.

One hypothesis is that the disparity is more apparent than real: That girls are better at masking/adapting to their symptoms, and thus more frequently escape diagnosis. The first step is to determine the extent to which this is true. If true, the underlying mechanism would need to be understood...some have suggested this could be related to greater inter-hemispheric connectivity in girls.


I think that question is, why are girls better at masking/adapting symptoms? Regardless of whether autism is more prevalent in girls, what it is about being girl that makes you mask better.


There is significant pressure on girls to behave in a manner that an adult might (quieter, more sociable, smiling, tolerant of situations) and significant pressure not to behave in an outwardly or rowdy manner (stimming, being hyperactive, responding in upset at being overstimulated, responding to sensory displeasure by rejection, etc).


I thought that autistic cant be pressured away from symptoms?


I think the parent comment is trying to say that the symptoms can be 'pressured away' by pressuring the child into masking their symptoms.


I've always wondered about this one: symptoms of autism are closer to the expected behaviour of girls than that of boys.


I touched on this in a nearby comment, but: I think that works, but only for the somewhat milder symptoms.


It would seem to me that masking works to a point (towards the "highly functioning" side of the spectrum), and once you get to the ways in which autism blocks ability to perform certain common behaviours and activities (e.g. non-verbal), the gender percentages should get closer again, because there's no masking to hide them or social expectations that they match. Is this the case?


I've seen research that suggests that estrogen could mitigate symptoms of autism, which could also explain a gender difference:

- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5193073/

- https://www.spectrumnews.org/news/estrogen-reverses-autism-l...


It should be noted that this research sample, as opposed to many autism samples, includes autism with non-verbal, and severe intellectual disability phenotypes of autism, phenotypes not always captured in neuroimaging research of adults due to compliance issues (We collect neuroimaging data while participants sleep in the scanner).


My hypothesis is that there's is a simpler, more-cultural answer, which is that girls with autism simply aren't diagnosed at the same rate that boys with autism are.


That is certainly one of the hypotheses in the mix. Personally, I think it accounts for some, but not all of the disparity.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: