Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I used to work for Pearson Longman, and one of their USPs was that their defining vocabulary was significantly smaller than the main competitors, namely OUP and CUP. Longman's was just over 2000 (about 2100 IIRC), whereas OUP's was approx 3000.

Even then, one is rather constrained and definitions frequently cross-referenced other words to bootstrap the definition.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: